Sum over histories and double slit?

beatlemaniacj
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I was recently studying Feynman's sum-over-histories approach to quantum probability. I also was reading an interesting paper on the double slit experiment. How do these two work together. Do some of the probability waves not have a out of phase partner to interfere with itself?

On a related not, what's the difference between the proxy wave, and Feynman's probability waves.

If the proxy wave is fictitious, how do atoms resist other atoms passing through it.

I know this is a lengthy question but please try to answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The easiest way to do the "sum over histories" for the 2 slit experiment, is to take the classical paths (2 of them) and just simply add up e^iS/h for the 2 different paths to get an amplitude. The probability is of course the absolute square of the amplitude. There is of course a normalizing factor, but that can be sometimes annoying to get, and I can't remember the details of that for the 2-slit experiment at this moment.
 
And that value (absolute square of the amplitude) would be the probability of the electron going through both slits?
 
No, the probability that the electron arrives at that spot in the detector. There is no probability for the electron "going through both slits".
 
This still applies in the case of an interference pattern when only one electron is fired.
 
Yes it does. You sum over both paths, but that doesn't mean the electron physically moves through both slits.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top