- #36
A.T.
Science Advisor
- 12,277
- 3,471
No explanation beyond the math already postedandyrk said:But I don't think it won't have any explanation.
No explanation beyond the math already postedandyrk said:But I don't think it won't have any explanation.
But you seem to be avoiding what it is telling you. The point of describing Physics (your sporting prfeormance and your Bank Balance) with maths is that Maths describes the relationships between Physical (and other) quantities very well and it predicts outcomes. What more is required? You seem to want to have a verbal narrative running in parallel with what the Maths is telling you. Why should this be necessary?andyrk said:I never avoided calculus.
andyrk said:Yeah, I know that. This is maths and not physics. But you still didn't explain that how ar changes the direction of the particle to keep it moving in a circle. My question is so simple, yet no one is able to answer it. I wonder why.
Yes, it does show a=v2/R, Thanks.DrGreg said:See post #20 with [itex]\ddot \theta = 0[/itex].