The atomic clock on a jetliner experiment

In summary, the Hafele-Keating experiment, which is similar to the standard twin paradox, was affected by both centrifugal forces and gravitational effects. The stationary clock at the north pole is considered to be stationary in an inertial frame while the moving clock in polar orbit has centripetal acceleration, making it not inertial. This is consistent with the observed time-dilation on earth, where clocks at the same gravitational potential but different velocities have different rates of ticking.
  • #1
jaydnul
558
15
Something I don't understand about that experiment, or about relativity in general. Why the clock on the jet flying around the world is the slower one. I mean isn't the stationary clock moving the same speed away from the jetliner clock relative to the jetliner clock?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Consider the standard twin paradox. Alice stays on Earth while Bob flies off in a relativistic rocket ship and then returns. There's no symmetry between Bob and Alice. Bob knows he traveled because he experienced accelerations. Alice knows she didn't because she never experienced any accelerations.

The Hafele-Keating experiment is basically the same thing. For simplicity, suppose Alice flies west at such a speed that she exactly cancels out the Earth's rotation, while Bob flies east at the same speed relative to the ground. It's not a matter of opinion who did what. Bob experienced a centrifugal force that Alice never experienced.
 
  • #3
lundyjb said:
I mean isn't the stationary clock moving the same speed away from the jetliner clock relative to the jetliner clock?
In addition to what bcrowell mentioned the experiment that you are talking about also was significantly affected by gravitational effects. The centrifugal acceleration breaks the symmetry wrt motion, and the altitude breaks the symmetry wrt gravitation.
 
  • #4
hi lundyjb! :smile:
lundyjb said:
… isn't the stationary clock moving the same speed away from the jetliner clock relative to the jetliner clock?

let's put the stationary clock at the north pole, and the moving clock in polar orbit

the stationary clock has zero acceleration

the moving clock has centripetal acceleration

so the stationary clock is stationary in an inertial frame, and the moving clock isn't

an observer stationary in an inertial frame regards all other clocks as slow :wink:
 
  • #5
lundyjb said:
Something I don't understand about that experiment, or about relativity in general. Why the clock on the jet flying around the world is the slower one. I mean isn't the stationary clock moving the same speed away from the jetliner clock relative to the jetliner clock?

Experience tells us that on or near earth, given two clocks at the same gravitational potential (altitude) the relevant velocity to use in the formulas for time-dilation is the velocity relative to a non-spinning Earth (eg. relative to the centre of the Earth or the north pole).

This is consistent with all experiments. Notice that there are also a form of time-dilation due to gravity which makes clocks high up in the atmosphere tick faster than clocks on the surface of the earth.

The clock on the jet flying eastwards is thus the slowest, the clock on the jet flying westwards the fastest, and the clock attached to the surface of the Earth comes in between.
 

1. How does the atomic clock on a jetliner experiment work?

The atomic clock on a jetliner experiment works by utilizing the principle of time dilation. The clock on the jetliner is synced with a stationary atomic clock on the ground before takeoff. As the jetliner travels at high speeds, time passes at a slightly slower rate for the clock on the jetliner compared to the stationary clock on the ground. This difference in time can be measured upon landing, providing evidence for Einstein's theory of relativity.

2. Why is the atomic clock on a jetliner experiment important?

The atomic clock on a jetliner experiment is important because it helps scientists better understand the concept of time dilation and its role in Einstein's theory of relativity. It also has practical applications in fields such as satellite navigation, where precise time measurements are crucial.

3. What are the limitations of the atomic clock on a jetliner experiment?

One limitation of the atomic clock on a jetliner experiment is that it can only measure time dilation at high speeds. Additionally, other factors such as turbulence and changes in altitude can affect the results of the experiment.

4. Has the atomic clock on a jetliner experiment been conducted before?

Yes, the atomic clock on a jetliner experiment has been conducted multiple times by various researchers. The most famous of these experiments is the Hafele-Keating experiment in 1971, which provided strong evidence for Einstein's theory of relativity.

5. Can the atomic clock on a jetliner experiment be used to time travel?

No, the atomic clock on a jetliner experiment cannot be used for time travel. While it does demonstrate the concept of time dilation, it does not allow for actual time travel as it is not possible to travel at speeds high enough to create a significant time difference.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
934
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
666
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
258
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
59
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
95
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
718
Back
Top