Thought Experiment Contradiction: Find the Answer

In summary, The observer on the spaceship emits a photon directly upwards, from the floor of his ship to the ceiling, and measures the time, call it T. To a stationary observer watching the ship fly by, the beam of light will travel in a diagonal path. If we use Pythagoras we can solve for the ratio of T/t and get the usual Lorentz Factor. Imagine the same situation, however now we have two ships, each traveling in the same direction but with different speeds. Call the slower ship v1 and the faster ship v2. In the same time t, as measured by a stationary observer, the slower ship will travel a distance v1*t, and the faster ship will travel a distance v2*t.
  • #1
dylanreynolds1
2
2
Hello all, I have a question that's been bothering me the last few days and wasn't sure where to turn.

Recall the original Special Relativity thought experiment: A spaceship travels at constant velocity v, moving in the positive x direction. An observer on the spaceship emits a photon directly upwards, from the floor of his ship to the ceiling, and measures the time, call it T. To a stationary observer watching the ship fly by, the beam of light will travel in a diagonal path. If we denote the time measured by the stationary observer t, then when the ship has traveled a distance v*t, the stationary observer will see the light travel a distance c*t. This situation can be modeled with a right triangle;

10dd3xk.jpg


If we use Pythagoras we can solve for the ratio of T/t and get the usual Lorentz Factor.

Now the question that has been bothering me: Imagine the same situation, however now we have two ships, each traveling in the same direction but with different speeds. Call the slower ship v1 and the faster ship v2. In the same time t, as measured by a stationary observer, the slower ship will travel a distance v1*t, and the faster ship will travel a distance v2*t. If each ship emits a photon at the same time, the stationary observer will see two beams of light, with the one coming from the faster ship making a smaller angle. We can model this with a pair of triangles;

xdw96w.jpg


From this diagram it appears that the photons, as measured by everyone involved, travel different distances in the vertical direction.
Since the ships are identical, does this mean the photon on the second ship does not make it to the ceiling at the same time the first one does? How would this discrepancy be resolved if the two moving observers were watching each other? Since there is no length contraction in the vertical direction I would expect the two photons to reach the top in the same amount of time. Does this mean an observer on one ship would see the photon of the other ship traveling slower?

Maybe I'm missing something, any thoughts are much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
dylanreynolds1 said:
Since the ships are identical, does this mean the photon on the second ship does not make it to the ceiling at the same time the first one does?
According to the "stationary" observer they do not.

dylanreynolds1 said:
Since there is no length contraction in the vertical direction I would expect the two photons to reach the top in the same amount of time.
Each rocket measures the same time for its own photon to reach the ceiling. But they observe that the clocks used by the other observers are running slowly.

dylanreynolds1 said:
Does this mean an observer on one ship would see the photon of the other ship traveling slower?
No. All observers "see" all photons as moving at the same speed.

To understand this, you'll need to consider the relativity of simultaneity.
 
  • #3
dylanreynolds1 said:
From this diagram it appears that the photons, as measured by everyone involved, travel different distances in the vertical direction.

Well, those diagrams were drawn by the stationary observer, so you can definitely conclude it's true for him.

Since there is no length contraction in the vertical direction I would expect the two photons to reach the top in the same amount of time.

Why? Look at the original figure you posted:

1.png


Now imagine that the stationary observer shoots a light pulse upward, and just as the ship passes it shoots its own light pulse upward.

2.png


Note that the stationary observer's light pulse travels upward a greater distance than the ship's pulse, because they spend the same amount of time traveling according to the stationary observer.

Here is what things look like to an observer at rest in the ship.

3.png


Note that the ship observer's light pulse travels upward a greater distance than the stationary observer's pulse, because they spend the same amount of time traveling according to the ship observer.
 
  • #4
This old video of mine (now posted on YouTube) might be helpful.

 

1. What is a thought experiment?

A thought experiment is a mental exercise or hypothetical scenario used to explore an idea or concept. It involves creating a hypothetical situation and then using logic and reasoning to analyze the potential outcomes and implications of that situation.

2. How does a thought experiment differ from a regular experiment?

A regular experiment involves physically manipulating variables and collecting data to test a hypothesis, while a thought experiment is purely mental and does not involve any physical manipulation or data collection. Thought experiments are often used in fields like philosophy and theoretical physics where physical experiments may not be possible.

3. What is the purpose of a thought experiment contradiction?

The purpose of a thought experiment contradiction is to challenge our understanding of a concept or idea by presenting a scenario that appears to contradict our current beliefs or knowledge. It can help us identify flaws in our reasoning or expand our thinking in new directions.

4. How can a thought experiment contradiction help us find an answer?

A thought experiment contradiction can help us find an answer by forcing us to critically examine our assumptions and consider alternative perspectives. It can also inspire further research and experimentation to test and refine our understanding of a concept.

5. Can thought experiments lead to real-world discoveries or advancements?

Yes, thought experiments have played a significant role in many scientific and technological advancements. For example, Albert Einstein's thought experiments on relativity led to the development of the theory of special relativity, which has had a profound impact on our understanding of the universe. Thought experiments can also inspire new ideas and approaches that can lead to practical applications in various fields.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
98
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
550
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
423
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
877
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
613
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top