'Thought Provoking' Request: UnOptimal ContinuumMechanics Terminology?

In summary, an 'Ideal Fluid' is a type of matter that can exist in both liquid and gas phase states. It typically has a zero shear modulus, meaning it can continually deform under applied shear stress or external force. Its behavior can be further specified by a Constitutive Material model, such as viscoelasticity.On the other hand, an 'Ideal Solid' is a type of matter that can exist in both solid and liquid phase states. It usually has a non-zero shear modulus, meaning it is not as easily deformed under shear stress. Its behavior can also be specified by a Constitutive Material model, such as elasticity, plasticity, or viscoelasticity. The term "solid" historically describes both the phase state
  • #1
Questionable Thought
5
0
A) I understand that an 'Ideal Fluid' Describe Behavior of Matter in Phase States of liquid/gas and sometimes Bulk-Solid:
-continually deform under applied shear stress or external force
-usually zero shear modulus
-behavior can further be specified by Constitutive Material model for that fluid, e.g. viscoelasticity

B) I understand that 'Ideal Solid' Describe Behavior of Matter in Phase States of Solid and sometimes Liquid:
-usually NON-zero shear modulus
-behavior can further be specified by Constitutive Material model for that solid, e.g. elasticity, plasticity, viscoelasticity
-solid-continua and structure elements

C) Historically, I understand the term Solid describes both phase state & matter behavior, whereas Fluid describes matter behavior for variety phase states

Assuming a just perfect enough world, and you would be the one to update the first term in Solid-Mechanics/Dynamics, then what more rigorous term would you update it with?

Would there even be a more general term instead of solid, as in the same spirit as fluid term? Any suggestions?-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS, by the way term solid is also used when describing e.g. cylinder that is not hollow, but again solid refers to phase state of matter. Is there more rigorous term than 'solid or un-hollow' to describe object that is not hollow?

[Moderator's note: Formatting removed. Please reduce the usage of colored, underlined or bold faced text as this is considered yelling on the internet.]
[Second note, editorial comments removed.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Do not intend to change terminology instead want thoughts. Please be patient with this question it's something that's been nagging at my brain for awhile. Thanks
 

1. What is the purpose of the term "UnOptimal" in Continuum Mechanics?

The term "UnOptimal" in Continuum Mechanics refers to a state or condition that is not the most efficient or ideal. It is often used to describe a system or process that is not functioning at its highest potential.

2. How does the use of "UnOptimal" terminology impact the study of Continuum Mechanics?

The use of "UnOptimal" terminology in Continuum Mechanics allows for a more nuanced understanding of complex systems and processes. It highlights areas that may need improvement and can lead to further research and development in the field.

3. Are there alternative terms that could be used instead of "UnOptimal" in Continuum Mechanics?

Yes, there are alternative terms that could be used in place of "UnOptimal" in Continuum Mechanics. Some examples include "suboptimal," "less than ideal," or "imperfect."

4. How do scientists determine which terminology to use in their research on Continuum Mechanics?

Scientists typically choose terminology based on its accuracy and relevance to their research. They may also consider the existing literature and common terminology used in the field.

5. Can the use of "UnOptimal" terminology in Continuum Mechanics be subjective?

Yes, the use of "UnOptimal" terminology can be subjective as it is based on individual perspectives and interpretations. However, it is important for scientists to provide clear definitions and justifications for their use of terminology in their research.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
16K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
8
Replies
264
Views
28K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top