Throwing a Stone: Calculating Time, Height, and Speed

In summary, the stone will hit the ground in 2 seconds, reach a maximum height of 16 feet, and needs to be thrown with a minimum speed of 48 ft/s to reach a height of 36 ft. The equations used were y(t) = -16(t)^2 + v0(t) + y0 and v = v0 - gt, with the final answer being obtained using the formula v0 = √(2gymax).
  • #1
Neophyte
44
0

Homework Statement


A stone is thrown upward from ground level. The initial speed is 32 ft/sec
a) In how many seconds will the stone hit the ground?
b) How high will it go?
c) With what minimum speed should the stone be thrown so as to reach a height of 36 ft?


Homework Equations



y(t) = -16(t)2 + v0(t) + y0

The Attempt at a Solution



A) y(t) = -16(t)2 + 32(t) +0

0 = -16(t)2 +32
t = 2 sec till it hits the ground

B)y'(t) = v(t) = -32t + 32
0 = -32t +32
t = 1 sec to reach max

-16 +32 = 16 ft max

C) y(t) = 36 ft y(t) = -16(t)2 +32(t)
-16(t)2 +32(t) = 36
+16(t)2 -32(t) +36 = 0
4(4(t)2 - 8(t) + 9 = 0


Then I assumed I was doing it wrong : /

I continued onward to get (t-1)2 = -(5/4)
t = 41/16
v(41/16) = -32(41/16) +32 = -50 = 50 ft/s

I got part c wrong naturally, any help on where it went wrong would be appreciated. Or if I did the first two wrong and just got the right answer. Either way, thanks for your time.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This belongs in the introductory physics forums.

You did A and B correctly.

C is a bit sloppy although not necessarily the wrong approach. You calculated t incorrectly, and when you're using [itex]v=v_0-gt[/itex], you use [itex]v_0=32 \;\;ft/sec[/itex], but you're trying to solve [itex]v_0[/itex]! [itex]v_0=32 \;\;ft/sec[/itex] belongs to the previous question and of course if the initial velocity is the same as in part a then the maximum height will be the same so this cannot be true.

The best way would be to start with the formula for the velocity, so you don't have to use the ABC formula.

[itex]v=v_0-gt[/itex], what value is v at its maximum height?
 
  • #3
Cyosis said:
[itex]v=v_0-gt[/itex], what value is v at its maximum height?

Velocity = 0 at max so the initial velocity is equivalent to gravity(t)?

0 = V0 - 16t

16t = V0

or V0/16 = t
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Since you have t now you can plug it into y(t) and solve for v0.
 
  • #5
So

y(V0/16) = -16(V0/16)2 + V0(t)

y(V0/16) = (V0)2/16 + V0(V0/16)

y(V0/16) = (V0)2/16 + (V0)2/16
y(V0/16) = 2V02/16

36 = 2V02/16

576 = 2V02

288 = V02

16.9 = V0

:cry: There is no hope it seems.

Step X) Answer is 48 b/c it is in the back of book, thus I win for now.
 
  • #6
Velocity = 0 at max so the initial velocity is equivalent to gravity(t)?

0 = V0 - 16t

16t = V0

or V0/16 = t

Since I don't use the imperial system I missed this at first, but isn't g 32 ft/sec in the imperial system?

y(V0/16) = -16(V0/16)2 + V0(t)

y(V0/16) = (V0)2/16 + V0(V0/16)

Where did the minus go?
 
  • #7
g is 32 ft /s but the formula is y(t) = - (1/2)gt2 + V0 Y0

The minus did vanish but then wouldn't I get y(t) = 0? Well 36 = 0

-V02/16 + V02/16
 
  • #8
g is 32 ft /s but the formula is y(t) = - (1/2)gt2 + V0 Y0

The minus did vanish but then wouldn't I get y(t) = 0?

Yes but you didn't use that formula, you used

[itex] v=v_0-gt[/itex] , what value is v at its maximum height?

to determine t.
 
  • #9
Finally, I think I love you tbh.

V0/32 = t

-16V02/1024 + V02/32

-16V02/1024 + 32V02/1024

36 = 16V02

36864 = 16V0

2304 = V0

48 ft/s = V0

Thank you for your help, I really appreciate it as I was close to burning the book.:blushing:
 
  • #10
You're welcome but you should really be less sloppy. Your answer is correct but if you wrote it down like that an exam I fear you would get very little points.

V0/32 = t

-16V02/1024 + V02/32

-16V02/1024 + 32V02/1024

All good so far.

then

36 = 16V0^2

You multiplied the right side by 1024, but didn't multiply the left side.

It should be [itex]36*1024=16v_0^2[/itex]

36864 = 16V0

Here the 1024 is back so the left hand side is correct now, but now you lose a square on the right hand side.

It should be

[itex]36864=16v_0^2[/itex]

2304 = V0

You divided by 16 on both sides correctly, but again the square is gone.

It should be [itex]2304=v_0^2[/itex]

48 ft/s = V0

I know you took the square root on both sides here, but as you've written the last two equations down it reads [itex]v_0=2304ft/s=48ft/s[/itex] which obviously isn't right.

Tip: I personally prefer to not fill in the numbers until the end. This way you're less prone to make mistakes. We know that [itex]t=\frac{v_0}{g}[/itex], therefore [itex]y_{max}=\frac{v_0^2}{g}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{v_0^2}{g}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{v_0^2}{g}[/itex]. Solve for v_0 gives [itex]\sqrt{2 g y_{max}}=v_0[/itex]. It is exactly the same method but a lot cleaner. Now enter the numbers and obtain your answer.
 
Last edited:

Related to Throwing a Stone: Calculating Time, Height, and Speed

What is the formula for calculating the time, height, and speed of a thrown stone?

The formula for calculating the time, height, and speed of a thrown stone is:

Time (t) = √(2h/g)

Height (h) = (gt²)/2

Speed (v) = gt

What is the value of "g" in the formula?

The value of "g" in the formula is the acceleration due to gravity, which is typically 9.8 m/s² on Earth.

Does the angle of the throw affect the calculations?

Yes, the angle of the throw does affect the calculations. The formula assumes that the stone is thrown at a 90 degree angle (straight up), so if the angle is different, the calculations will be different as well.

Can this formula be used for any object thrown in the air?

No, this formula is specifically for a stone thrown straight up in the air. The calculations will be different for objects thrown at different angles or with different shapes or sizes.

What factors can affect the accuracy of these calculations?

Several factors can affect the accuracy of these calculations, including air resistance, wind, and the shape and weight of the stone. Additionally, the formula assumes a constant acceleration due to gravity, which may not be the case in all situations.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top