B Time Dilation: Away or Toward Observer?

Involute
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I thought the answer was no. I.e. the traveler's proper time always passes more slowly than a stationary observer's clock regardless of the traveler's direction with respect to the observer. I was watching Brian Greene's NOVA episode on time, however, and, at 23:15, he has a demonstration involving an alien 10 billion lightyears from Earth riding a bicycle away from, and then towards, us. When he's riding away, time slows down for him (with respect to us). When he's riding towards, it speeds up. This seems contradictory, but maybe I'm missing a detail, or misunderstood SR to begin with (or both). Thanks for any tips.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Involute said:
I thought the answer was no. I.e. the traveler's proper time always passes more slowly than a stationary observer's clock regardless of the traveler's direction with respect to the observer. I was watching Brian Greene's NOVA episode on time, however, and, at 23:15, he has a demonstration involving an alien 10 billion lightyears from Earth riding a bicycle away from, and then towards, us. When he's riding away, time slows down for him (with respect to us). When he's riding towards, it speeds up. This seems contradictory, but maybe I'm missing a detail, or misunderstood SR to begin with (or both). Thanks for any tips.
That all makes no sense. I notice the title of the video is:
The Fabric of the Cosmos: The Illusion of Time

I doubt you can learn any serious science from a video like that. It's not surprising you got some nonsense about an alien on a bicycle!
 
@Involute If A and B are moving relative to one another and watching each other’s clocks through telescopes... if they are moving towards one another they will both see the other’s clock running fast, and if they are moving away from one another they will both see the other’s clock running slow. This has nothing to do with relativity and time dilation; it’s just the Doppler effect, caused by the light travel time changing as the distance between them changes.

However, when they allow for the light travel time - that is, the light they see in their telescopes was emitted earlier and spent some time getting to them - and calculate the clock rates that would produce what they actually see then they both calculate that the other’s clock is running slower than their own. That is relativistic time dilation, and it is best understood as a manifestation of the relativity of simultaneity, not as “time slowing down”.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Motore, hmmm27 and 1 other person
You are misinterpreting that part of the video. The difference between the two cases of the alien going away versus toward Earth is not about how fast the clock ticks. It is about how the clocks at different positions are synchronized to define simultaneous time ("now") in the reference frame of the alien as he goes away versus as he goes toward the earth.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top