Time taken to travel to the andromeda galaxy, oserved from earth

In summary: So is your calculation. In summary, the time it would take for the traveler to reach the Andromeda galaxy, as measured by an observer on Earth, is 2 550 000/0,82 c years.
  • #1
romanawgarlic
6
0

Homework Statement


A traveller with mass m = 66,5 kg travels with a velocity of 0,82 c to the Andromeda galaxy which is a distance of 2,55·106 lightyears away. Light with the wavelength 459,4 nm is emitted from the galaxy. assume the galaxy doesn't move and use the exact speed of light.

How long time (in million years, year=365,25 days) will the journey take for an observer on earth?

Homework Equations


i don't really know...
possibly:
time dilation T = To / √( 1 - (v2/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution


first of all, id just like to confess that the whole relativity concept is, unsurprisingly, doing my head in a little. i can pretty much grasp the way the speed of light is a constant and that time slows down when things approach the speed of light, and I am usually ok with questions on the doppler effect, red/blue shift and relativistic energy, but I am fairly certain all of the pieces have yet to fall into place.

also, i know a lot of the info in the question isn't relevant (im guessing the velocity and the distance are the ones that actually matter) nonetheless, I am giving the entire question just in case.

Ok, so the part that's confusing me about this specific problem is the matter of what effect time dilation would have on the observer on earth. i understand that the observer on Earth would observe clocks moving slowly on the spaceship, but wouldn't that not affect the observer since he is outside the traveling object?

intuitively, i'd say that the answer is just 2,55·106 lightyears divided by 0.82 c, but this is obviously too simple.

my next instinct is to plug the values into the time dilation equation, but i would love to understand why I am supposed to do that. even then, i imagine I'm missing some aspects of the question...

obviously, its a little amateurish to try to do physics on instinct and intuition, but reading up on the subject has only made me more confused so far. would love any help on the subject, even if its just a link to yet another explanation on special relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
romanawgarlic said:

Homework Statement


A traveller with mass m = 66,5 kg travels with a velocity of 0,82 c to the Andromeda galaxy which is a distance of 2,55·106 lightyears away. Light with the wavelength 459,4 nm is emitted from the galaxy. assume the galaxy doesn't move and use the exact speed of light.

How long time (in million years, year=365,25 days) will the journey take for an observer on earth?

Homework Equations


i don't really know...
possibly:
time dilation T = To / √( 1 - (v2/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution


first of all, id just like to confess that the whole relativity concept is, unsurprisingly, doing my head in a little. i can pretty much grasp the way the speed of light is a constant and that time slows down when things approach the speed of light, and I am usually ok with questions on the doppler effect, red/blue shift and relativistic energy, but I am fairly certain all of the pieces have yet to fall into place.

also, i know a lot of the info in the question isn't relevant (im guessing the velocity and the distance are the ones that actually matter) nonetheless, I am giving the entire question just in case.

Ok, so the part that's confusing me about this specific problem is the matter of what effect time dilation would have on the observer on earth. i understand that the observer on Earth would observe clocks moving slowly on the spaceship, but wouldn't that not affect the observer since he is outside the traveling object?

intuitively, i'd say that the answer is just 2,55·106 lightyears divided by 0.82 c, but this is obviously too simple.

my next instinct is to plug the values into the time dilation equation, but i would love to understand why I am supposed to do that. even then, i imagine I'm missing some aspects of the question...

obviously, its a little amateurish to try to do physics on instinct and intuition, but reading up on the subject has only made me more confused so far. would love any help on the subject, even if its just a link to yet another explanation on special relativity.

Your instincts are rather more accurate than you give them credit for. It's not a complicated question. You have the right procedure.
 
  • #3
Your intuitive answer is not only simple, it's right (congratulations!). To see this, consider the following:
1. The observer on Earth sees the Andromeda galaxy as 2 550 000 light-years away.
2. The observer on Earth sees the traveler moving at a speed 0,82 c towards the Andromeda galaxy.
3. The speed of something, as measured by any observer, is just the distance traveled (as measured by that observer) divided by the time interval (as measured by the same observer).

Different observers measure different distances, time intervals, and speeds (for that you need relativity), but we're only talking about one observer (and one who isn't changing motion by firing rocket engines to turn around or something similar).

Therefore: the observer on Earth measures a time (for the trip out to the Andromeda galaxy, not the round trip) of 2 550 000 c year/0,82 c = 2 550 000/0,82. For a round trip (to Andromeda and back), the Earth observer would measure a time twice as long, assuming the traveler turned around as soon as she or he got to Andromeda and returned at the same speed.

The traveler would measure a different time interval (for the traveler, it's the galaxy that moves toward the traveler, but because of the Lorentz constraction, the traveler measures a shorter distance between Earth and Andromeda than we (on Earth) do.
 
  • #4
Dick said:
Your instincts are rather more accurate than you give them credit for. It's not a complicated question. You have the right procedure.


well, now that I've typed out my thoughts i realized more specifically what my question is: I'm guessing i'd get the time from the velocity times distance, but which side of the equation would that time go to? would that be the T or the To ?

i imagine the To, bbecause the To in the equation refers to the time one would experience on the spaceship, and that's the way these questions are usually formulated. this would imply that the time experienced on the spaceship would be the time one would expect the journey to take if we were dealing with normal speeds and distances, and the time experienced on Earth would be longer. why is it not the other way round?

oh, and thanks for the help so far. i reckon ill be able to do the question now, however, if you have the time i would love some explanation as to why this is so. :)
 
  • #5
romanawgarlic said:
well, now that I've typed out my thoughts i realized more specifically what my question is: I'm guessing i'd get the time from the velocity times distance, but which side of the equation would that time go to? would that be the T or the To ?

i imagine the To, bbecause the To in the equation refers to the time one would experience on the spaceship, and that's the way these questions are usually formulated. this would imply that the time experienced on the spaceship would be the time one would expect the journey to take if we were dealing with normal speeds and distances, and the time experienced on Earth would be longer. why is it not the other way round?

oh, and thanks for the help so far. i reckon ill be able to do the question now, however, if you have the time i would love some explanation as to why this is so. :)

to clarify: i'd have thought the time one would expect to experience from Earth would be the distance times velocity, and the time experienced on the spaceship would be shorter. why is this not so (phew, its hard to express oneself accurately in words about this sort of thing!)
 
  • #6
511keV said:
Your intuitive answer is not only simple, it's right (congratulations!). To see this, consider the following:
1. The observer on Earth sees the Andromeda galaxy as 2 550 000 light-years away.
2. The observer on Earth sees the traveler moving at a speed 0,82 c towards the Andromeda galaxy.
3. The speed of something, as measured by any observer, is just the distance traveled (as measured by that observer) divided by the time interval (as measured by the same observer).

Different observers measure different distances, time intervals, and speeds (for that you need relativity), but we're only talking about one observer (and one who isn't changing motion by firing rocket engines to turn around or something similar).

Therefore: the observer on Earth measures a time (for the trip out to the Andromeda galaxy, not the round trip) of 2 550 000 c year/0,82 c = 2 550 000/0,82. For a round trip (to Andromeda and back), the Earth observer would measure a time twice as long, assuming the traveler turned around as soon as she or he got to Andromeda and returned at the same speed.

The traveler would measure a different time interval (for the traveler, it's the galaxy that moves toward the traveler, but because of the Lorentz constraction, the traveler measures a shorter distance between Earth and Andromeda than we (on Earth) do.

ooops, missed you there, sir/mam! thank you, that confirmed my suspicions and made everything a whole lot clearer! sneaky, sneaky question...
 
  • #7
romanawgarlic said:
to clarify: i'd have thought the time one would expect to experience from Earth would be the distance times velocity,
umm... divided by
and the time experienced on the spaceship would be shorter. why is this not so
What will be the distance as perceived from the spaceship?
 

1. How long does it take to travel to the Andromeda galaxy from Earth?

The time taken to travel to the Andromeda galaxy from Earth depends on the mode of transportation. With our current technology, it would take approximately 2.5 million years to reach the Andromeda galaxy using conventional spacecraft.

2. How far away is the Andromeda galaxy from Earth?

The Andromeda galaxy is approximately 2.5 million light years away from Earth. This means that it takes 2.5 million years for the light from the Andromeda galaxy to reach Earth.

3. Can humans survive the journey to the Andromeda galaxy?

With our current technology, it is not possible for humans to survive the journey to the Andromeda galaxy. The distance is too great and the time it would take to travel there is too long for humans to survive.

4. How is the time taken to travel to the Andromeda galaxy calculated?

The time taken to travel to the Andromeda galaxy is calculated by taking into account the speed of the spacecraft, the distance between Earth and the Andromeda galaxy, and the effects of relativity. It is a complex calculation that involves many factors.

5. Will future technology make it possible to travel to the Andromeda galaxy in a shorter amount of time?

It is possible that future technology may make it possible to travel to the Andromeda galaxy in a shorter amount of time. However, it is likely that it will still take a very long time to reach the Andromeda galaxy, even with advanced technology.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
424
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
781
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
811
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
3
Replies
81
Views
11K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top