To Americans: Opinion on our schools.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blahness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schools
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights significant concerns regarding the state of American public schools, with opinions divided on their effectiveness. Many participants express dissatisfaction, particularly with elementary education, citing issues like grade inflation and inadequate preparation in critical subjects such as math. The quality of education is noted to vary greatly based on location and individual teachers, with some students receiving excellent instruction while others are passed through the system without mastering essential skills. Additionally, there is a call for reforms, including raising academic standards and improving teacher accountability, rather than simply increasing funding. The conversation underscores the complexity of the public education system and the need for targeted improvements to enhance overall student learning outcomes.

How are American public schools?


  • Total voters
    45
  • #51
After extensive research, I've concluded that Gale is correct.

Schools, indeed, cater to lower-intellect students. For example, because of some teacher's idea, we were set to cut out and make our own DNA strands, to "solidify the memorization of DNA".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Public schools are a god awful failure in this country. Part of it is cultural, and part of it is political. Doesn't change the fact that they are a collective failure.
 
  • #53
Blahness said:
Chi, if that's how NCLB acts, then it NEEDS to be changed.
I don't consider a school to be "succeeding" if they lose 130 MAT tests. Which happened in 4th grade. THEY LOST AN ENTIRE GRADE'S MAT TESTS.
Anyway, earlier points, discuss.


NCLB has done nothing but double the education budget, without bringing a corresponding improvement. Nothing but politicians doing what they always do, throw money at a problem so it looks like you care.
 
  • #54
Cosmo16 said:
My friend asked his physics teacher about the gravity on a hollow earth, (At the same time as I posted it here) and the teacher had to go get another physics teacher.
I think that this is part of the problem, many teacher stop atempting to learn after they graduate college.

At least the teacher cared enough to sufficiently answer the question rather than making something up or downplaying the importance of answering it. I would say this is exactly the opposite of the problem you describe of teachers stopping the attempt to learn. It's probably not easy for a teacher to risk appearing ignorant in front of the class (I assume) by asking another teacher for help.

I don't want to deride any of me teachers because I think they are all exceptional (some are absolutely phenomenal) but it bothers the hell out of me when I get a response like "I'm too tired think about it right now." to a question I've been pondering. I think this has only happened to me once but I imagine it would be more common in other schools.

I'm currently a senior in a public high school ranked in the top 50 of the nation on http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7723397/site/newsweek/" chart, which, in my opinion, doesn't use the best method to rank high schools but it's the only way I've found of comparing my school to others (there is no "best" way to rank qualitative values anyway). The basis for my voting "bad" on this poll was because I consider my school "average" in relation to what I think would be an ideal educational environment and I've heard/read that my county is one of the top (ten maybe) counties in the nation for public schools and that my school is one of the best in the nation.

I say average because, while I think that my school is relatively quite safe and students are highly motivated, true, rigorous understanding of the material being taught is almost never stressed and is in no way required to get a GPA over 4. I think others have mentioned this problem too. I think there is something fundamentally wrong with an "education" system when one can learn more efficiently and gain a better understanding after a few hours of sitting at home (with the internet, books, or otherwise) than after two days of classes. I'm also surprised at how much the system seems to value knowledge over intelligence - students are handed out proofs of mathematical concepts and whatnot and the proofs gone over, which is great, but are never encouraged to try to prove something themselves.

All that being said I am content with my school, anyone seeking a deeper understanding of material being taught and willing to devote time outside of regular class times is generally helped quite a bit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
15K
Replies
50
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
46
Views
9K
Back
Top