Total moment caused by an unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft

In summary, the problem involves a rotating shaft with a concentrated unbalanced load of 8lb at a radius of 2 inches, a constant vertical load of 1500 lb applied by two anti-friction bearings, and a required diameter of the shaft at the midpoint for a design factor of safety of 2. The book provides an answer for the bending moment due to the rotating load and the constant vertical load, but the calculation process is not clear. After further analysis, it is determined that the issue lies in the use of imperial units, and the correct calculations lead to a close approximation of the book's answer. The torque equation is multiplied by 0.5 because it is necessary to calculate the reaction force at each end of the
  • #1
fahraynk
186
6

Homework Statement


[/B]
The shaft connecting A to D is rotating at 1200RPM clockwise and has a concentrated unbalanced load of W2 of 8lb at a radius of 2in. in a plane midway between points A and D as shown in the figure. A constant vertical load W1 of 1500 lb is applied by means of two anti-friction bearings B and C. If the shaft material has an ultimate strength of 60,000 PSI and yield strength 45,000 PSI, determine the required diameter of the shaft at the mid section for a design factor of safety N=2. Only consider the mid point.

upload_2017-8-1_19-35-40.png

Homework Equations


W1=1500 lb
W2=8 lb

The Attempt at a Solution


The book gives an answer, and part of the answer is this : "(1)Show that the bending moment due to the rotating load varies from -6540 in-lb to 6540 in-lb. (2) show that the bending moment due to the constant vertical load is 7500 in-lb. (3) The combined bending moment then varies from 960 in-lb to 14,040 in-lb."

I can't figure out how the book got (1) or (2). Here is my work :
To get forces at B and C due to load W1:
$$B+C=-1500\\\\14(1500)-20C=0\\\\B=-450\\\\C=-1050$$
To get forces at A and D:
$$A-450-8-1050+D=0\\\\450*10+8*20+1050*30-D*40=0\\\\A=604\\\\D=904$$

This gives me this moment diagram:
upload_2017-8-1_19-48-30.png


7580 total moment max at the 20" mark.

Okay, so the book says the bending moment due to the rotating load varies from -6540 to 6540 in-lb.
I don't understand where they got this from. Is this ONLY the rotating load? So, that would mean solve a force diagram where W1 is removed? That makes no sense because then you would have A=4 lb B = 4 lb holding up W1=8 lb. The bending moment would be 8*20 = 160

So, I try to take the rotation into account.
It is rotating at w=1200RPM $$w=[1200[RPM]*\frac{2\pi}{60}[\frac{Rads}{RPM * Sec}] = 125.7[\frac{Rads}{Sec}]$$
This would give the mass a velocity of RwCos(wt) = 2*125.7= 251.4
Also an acceleration dv/dt = -Rw^2sin(wt), with a min and max of +-Rw^2.
But... ##R*w^2=2*125.7^2=31601 >> 6540## ... So this has to be wrong. Not even close to 6540.

Here is another failed attempt :
If I look at that section of the beam as a 2D section, it would be a circle with a mass 2 inches from the center. Sum of torque = change in angular momentum :
$$T= dH/dt \\\\
H=I_{zz}w \hat{k} + [-R\hat{i} x (-8Rw\hat{j})]$$
mass of the shaft is 0, so I_zz vanishes. ##H=8R^2w\hat{k}##
dH/dt=0 because w is constant. Sum of Torques = 0. That would mean r cross F = 0, no forces in the tangential direction, nothing that would point down..

What am I doing wrong!? Please help
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-8-1_19-48-15.png
    upload_2017-8-1_19-48-15.png
    78.9 KB · Views: 451
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Not really my field, and I normally work in Metric but you posted this yesterday and haven't had a reply yet so here goes...

fahraynk said:
Okay, so the book says the bending moment due to the rotating load varies from -6540 to 6540 in-lb. I don't understand where they got this from. Is this ONLY the rotating load?

That would be my understanding.

I agree ω is 125.7 rads/s

fahraynk said:
This would give the mass a velocity of RwCos(wt) = 2*125.7= 251.4
Also an acceleration dv/dt = -Rw^2sin(wt), with a min and max of +-Rw^2.
But... R∗w2=2∗125.72=31601>>6540R∗w2=2∗125.72=31601>>6540R*w^2=2*125.7^2=31601 >> 6540 ... So this has to be wrong. Not even close to 6540.

I'm really struggling to remember how to use imperial units but I think that's where the issue is...

The centripetal force is..
Fc = mω²r
where
mass m = 8lbs = 0.2484 slugs
ω = 125.7 rads/s
r = 2/12 = 0.1667ft

Fc = 0.2484 * 125.72 * 0.1667
= 654.3 lbf

So now we have a beam AD length 40" (3.33ft) with a 654.3lbf force in the middle. Then calculate the bending moment. Note their answer is in "in-lbs" not "ft-lb". Again I'm very rusty but I think in this simple case it's

20" * 0.5 * 654.3 = 6543 in-lb

Close enough.
 
  • Like
Likes fahraynk
  • #3
Q2 asks..
show that the bending moment due to the constant vertical load is 7500 in-lb
but you wrote
A−450−8−1050+D=0
450∗10+8∗20+1050∗30−D∗40=0
..which includes W2 the 8lb rotating mass. I think you should ignore that in which case you get..

A−450−1050+D=0
450∗10+1050∗30−D∗40=0
(4500 + 31500)/40 = D
A=600
D=900
 
  • Like
Likes fahraynk
  • #4
CWatters said:
So now we have a beam AD length 40" (3.33ft) with a 654.3lbf force in the middle. Then calculate the bending moment. Note their answer is in "in-lbs" not "ft-lb". Again I'm very rusty but I think in this simple case it's

20" * 0.5 * 654.3 = 6543 in-lb

Close enough.

Thanks... wow... it was the units... LOL.

Hey, why did you multiply the torque equation by 0.5? (20 inches * 0.5 * 654.3 lbF) instead of (20 inches * 654.3 lbF) Is it an average because its a rotating?

PS Thanks so much for helping! I really really appreciate it! Thought this one was not going to get an answer!
 
  • #5
fahraynk said:
Hey, why did you multiply the torque equation by 0.5? (20 inches * 0.5 * 654.3 lbF) instead of (20 inches * 654.3 lbF) Is it an average because its a rotating?

No. As I recall when you work out the bending moment you first work out the reaction force at each end of the beam. The 654.3lbf load is in the middle so the reaction force at each end is half of that.
 
  • Like
Likes fahraynk
  • #6
CWatters said:
No. As I recall when you work out the bending moment you first work out the reaction force at each end of the beam. The 654.3lbf load is in the middle so the reaction force at each end is half of that.
thanks!
?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmemecrunch.com%2Fmeme%2F2TQQO%2Fhero-of-the-day%2Fimage.png
 

What is the total moment caused by an unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft?

The total moment caused by an unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft is the sum of all the individual moments caused by the unbalanced mass at different points along the shaft.

How does an unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft affect the overall system?

An unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft can cause vibrations in the system, which can lead to increased wear and tear on components and potential failure.

What factors can contribute to an unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft?

An unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft can be caused by manufacturing defects, uneven distribution of mass on the shaft, or wear and tear over time.

How can the total moment caused by an unbalanced mass be reduced?

The total moment caused by an unbalanced mass can be reduced by balancing the rotating shaft, which involves redistributing or removing mass to achieve a more symmetrical distribution.

What are the consequences of not addressing an unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft?

If left unaddressed, an unbalanced mass on a rotating shaft can lead to increased stress on components, reduced efficiency, and potential failure of the system.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
650
Back
Top