Twin Paradox: Tom & Jerry Agree on Clock Time But Who is Older?

In summary, Tom and Jerry are moving at constant velocity past each other and, after a sufficient amount of time, each believes that the other is older due to time dilation. However, this belief is based on their own frame of reference and does not necessarily reflect reality. Additionally, the concept of "age" becomes ambiguous in this scenario and can only be compared when the two individuals are at the same location and their clocks are synchronized. The twin paradox, which involves a traveller returning to Earth, is often mistakenly applied to this situation, but it is a separate phenomenon that requires consideration of both time dilation and relativity of simultaneity. Ultimately, the discrepancy in their clocks is due to differences in how they have synchronized them along the path of
  • #1
imsmooth
152
13
I know this has been asked so many times, but would someone please answer why to this particular variation to the question.

Tom is moving at constant velocity past Jerry on Earth (assume no acceleration). At the moment they pass each other they agree on the time seen on a clock. Tom thinks Jerry is moving past him; Jerry thinks Tom is moving past him. After a sufficient time moving away from the other at relativistic speed (and no turning around), who is older? Each thinks the other is older.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, each person measures time dilation at the other person. Otherwise the principle that inertial frames are equivalent would be violated.

Who's older? Well, to sensibly answer that question you need to compare their clocks with the lapsed proper times. And for that...well, guess what.
 
  • #3
imsmooth said:
I know this has been asked so many times, but would someone please answer why to this particular variation to the question.

Tom is moving at constant velocity past Jerry on Earth (assume no acceleration). At the moment they pass each other they agree on the time seen on a clock. Tom thinks Jerry is moving past him; Jerry thinks Tom is moving past him. After a sufficient time moving away from the other at relativistic speed (and no turning around), who is older? Each thinks the other is older.
There are a number of issues here.

First, let's tidy this up by having Tom and Jerry synchronise their watches as they pass each other. Then, let's have a well-defined second event, such as Tom reaching Mars.

Now, you can analyse this from either Tom or Jerry's frame and things are clear. Tom's watch will show a definite time as he passes Mars. There is no issue there.

Second, unless Tom and Jerry are at the same location, it's not clear what it means for one to be "older" than the other. Who is measuring age? And how are they measuring it?

Third, unless one of them changes their state of motion, then can never meet again to compare the time on their watches. Time dilation, therefore, is not equivalent to differential ageing. The time dilation in this case is symmetric. Each measures the others clock to be running slow (not fast), but unless one of them change their state of motion, this doesn't lead to any contradiction.
 
  • #4
imsmooth said:
Each thinks the other is older.
Each thinks the other is younger. They don't have the same definition of "at the same time" except when they are co-located. So the question "how old is the other guy at the same time as my clock shows one year since we met" means different things and there isno contradiction in both of them saying the other is younger.
 
  • #5
imsmooth said:
After a sufficient time moving away from the other at relativistic speed (and no turning around), who is older? Each thinks the other is older.
That is correct, but when you remember to consider the relativity as well as time dilation, there is no paradox. We have a number of older postings explaining the relationship between time dilation and relativity of simultaneity and how you need both to make sense of this apparently contradictory situation.

Be aware that what you're describing here is not the twin paradox. The twin paradox arises when the traveller turns around and returns to earth. In that situation, and for reasons that have nothing to do with time dilation, the traveller will unambiguously be younger at the reunion - and the apparent paradox is that at every step of the traveller's journey time dilation suggests that they should find the Earth twin to be aging more slowly. In this case the paradox comes from erroneous misapplication of the time dilation formula.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Each is observing the other at a moving location along the relative path. Each one thinks that the other is moving behind him on that path. The discrepancy in their clocks is being determined in opposite directions in different locations. So there is no paradox. Each one thinks that the other is aging slower (clocks going slower) than it should. So the problem really is all about how each one has synchronized his own clocks along the path of relative motion.
 

1. Why is it called the "Twin Paradox"?

The "Twin Paradox" refers to the thought experiment in which one twin travels through space at high speeds while the other stays on Earth. When the traveling twin returns, they would have aged less than the twin who stayed on Earth, creating a paradox as both twins started with the same age.

2. How does the "Twin Paradox" relate to Einstein's theory of relativity?

The "Twin Paradox" is a consequence of Einstein's theory of relativity, specifically the theory of special relativity. This theory states that time and space are relative and can be affected by the speed of an object. In the case of the "Twin Paradox", the traveling twin experiences time dilation, causing them to age slower than the stationary twin.

3. Why do Tom and Jerry agree on clock time but have different ages?

Tom and Jerry agree on clock time because they are both traveling at the same speed and experiencing the same time dilation. However, because Tom is moving relative to Jerry, he experiences time at a slower rate, causing him to age slower than Jerry.

4. Is the "Twin Paradox" just a thought experiment or has it been observed in real life?

The "Twin Paradox" has not been observed in real life as it requires one twin to travel at extremely high speeds, close to the speed of light. However, the effects of time dilation have been observed in experiments involving atomic clocks and high-speed particles, providing evidence for the validity of Einstein's theory of relativity.

5. Can the "Twin Paradox" be explained by the concept of time travel?

No, the "Twin Paradox" cannot be explained by the concept of time travel. While the traveling twin may experience time at a slower rate, they are still moving forward in time and cannot go back in time to meet their younger twin. The paradox arises because of the difference in time experienced by the two twins, not because of any actual time travel.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
648
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
716
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
938
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top