U.K. Parliament report on 2011 war in Libya

  • News
  • Thread starter nsaspook
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Report
In summary: And we're not there yet.Yes there such a thing as PC and yes its grown worse. Yes half measures in the face of agression invite war instead of avoid it. But my point is that I see no point. Last try: what does "finish" the last war mean in the sense of avoiding WWII, Korea, or Vietnam? Invade the allied Soviet Union in 1945, or later, after they had the bomb, in 1949? The Soviets lost 20 million in WWII. How many should the Americans (broke in 1945) alone have killed (and it would have been alone)?In summary, Obama's policy in Libya was not informed by accurate intelligence and led to the growth
  • #1
nsaspook
Science Advisor
1,349
3,566
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmfaff/119/119.pdf
In March 2011, the United Kingdom and France, with the support of the United States, led the international community to support an intervention in Libya to protect civilians from attacks by forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi. This policy was not informed by accurate intelligence. In particular, the Government failed to identify that the threat to civilians was overstated and that the rebels included a significant Islamist element. By the summer of 2011, the limited intervention to protect civilians had drifted into an opportunist policy of regime change. That policy was not underpinned by a strategy to support and shape post-Gaddafi Libya. The result was political and economic collapse, inter-militia and inter-tribal warfare, humanitarian and migrant crises, widespread human rights violations, the spread of Gaddafi regime weapons across the region and the growth of ISIL in North Africa. Through his decision making in the National Security Council, former Prime Minister David Cameron was ultimately responsible for the failure to develop a coherent Libya strategy.

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/04/obamas-worst-mistake-libya/478461/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"Precision warfare" is an oxymoron. If you're going to go to war do so ... without deadlines, limits, or any other "humanitarian" constraints prolonging things.
 
  • #3
Yeah, Libya is Obama's Iraq (caveat: Iraq is a little bit Obama's Iraq too). Doesn't get a lot of press, but the history books will realize this wasn't exclusively an Obama or Bush problem, but rather an America problem and a "war ain't what it used to be" problem. And probably a "Middle East is unstable" problem.
 
  • Like
Likes edward and nsaspook
  • #4
Bystander said:
...If you're going to go to war do so ... without deadlines, limits, or any other "humanitarian" constraints prolonging things.
Which American war do you contend would historically qualify as meeting your guidelines?
 
  • #5
mheslep said:
Which American war do you contend would historically qualify as meeting your guidelines?
Since the advent of "precision/surgical weapons?" Grenada ... and ... that's about it.
 
  • #6
Bystander said:
Since the advent of "precision/surgical weapons?" Grenada ... and ... that's about it.
Any American war, in any time. I don't believe any of them were executed with zero limits, with zero humanitarian constraints.
 
  • #7
mheslep said:
Any American war, in any time. I don't believe any of them were executed with zero limits, with zero humanitarian constraints.
That's the point, isn't it? We have very seldom gritted our teeth and finished a war. WWI begat WWII; WWII begat The Malayan Emergency, Korea, Vietnam ... All for the sake of "political correctness."
 
  • #8
Bystander said:
That's the point, isn't it? We have very seldom gritted our teeth and finished a war. WWI begat WWII; WWII begat The Malayan Emergency, Korea, Vietnam ... All for the sake of "political correctness."
Yes there such a thing as PC and yes its grown worse. Yes half measures in the face of agression invite war instead of avoid it. But my point is that I see no point. Last try: what does "finish" the last war mean in the sense of avoiding WWII, Korea, or Vietnam? Invade the allied Soviet Union in 1945, or later, after they had the bomb, in 1949? The Soviets lost 20 million in WWII. How many should the Americans (broke in 1945) alone have killed (and it would have been alone)?
 
  • #10
To elaborate: if you're going to fight, FIGHT (or to quote Tuco in The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, "When you have to shoot, shoot. Don't talk."); the art to all this is knowing "when/if."
 

1. What was the purpose of the U.K. Parliament report on the 2011 war in Libya?

The purpose of the report was to review and assess the role of the U.K. government in the military intervention in Libya in 2011, as well as the decision-making process leading up to it.

2. What were the key findings of the U.K. Parliament report?

The report concluded that the U.K. government's intervention in Libya was based on flawed intelligence and a lack of understanding of the situation on the ground. It also found that the government failed to adequately plan for the aftermath of the intervention, leading to chaos and instability in the region.

3. How did the U.K. Parliament report impact the government's actions?

The report led to significant criticism of the government's decision-making process and actions in Libya. It also prompted calls for reforms in how the government makes decisions about military interventions in the future.

4. What were the implications of the U.K. Parliament report for international relations?

The report raised questions about the U.K.'s role in international interventions and its relationship with other countries involved in the conflict, such as France and the United States. It also highlighted the importance of considering the potential consequences of military interventions before taking action.

5. Has the U.K. government responded to the U.K. Parliament report?

Yes, the government released a formal response to the report in 2017, acknowledging some of the criticisms and outlining steps being taken to address the issues raised. However, some critics argue that the response did not go far enough and that further action is needed to prevent similar mistakes in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
Replies
31
Views
5K
Back
Top