Uncertainty analysis of 2 port measurement

In summary, equations (2.83) and (2.67) from the two books describe the measurement of permittivity and permeability using transmission, reflection, and short circuit line methods, but the differences in the results can be attributed to various factors.
  • #1
Radiosan
1
0
I analyzed uncertainty analysis of 2 port measurement. I referenced 2 book

"Transmission Reflection and Short Circuit Line Methods for Measuring Permittivity and Permeability"
at pages 31 equation(2.83)

"Transmission and Reflection and SCL Permittivity Measurements" at pages 44 equation(2.67)

You can google 2 book name to find them.

I plot equation(2.83) and equation(2.67) but they look different.
2017-05-27_234400.png


blue line is equation(2.67) and green line is equation(2.67)

Do they describe the same thing? Why are the results different?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Thank you for sharing your analysis on uncertainty analysis of 2 port measurement and referencing the two books. I understand that you have plotted equations (2.83) and (2.67) from the two books and have noticed that the results are different.

To answer your question, yes, both equations describe the same thing, which is the measurement of permittivity and permeability using the transmission, reflection, and short circuit line methods. However, the difference in the results could be due to various factors such as the measurement setup, equipment used, and experimental conditions.

It is important to note that equations (2.83) and (2.67) may have been derived using different assumptions and approximations, leading to variations in the results. Additionally, the equations may have been validated using different experimental data, which can also contribute to the differences in the results.

Furthermore, the accuracy of the results also depends on the precision and accuracy of the measurement equipment and the techniques used in the measurement process. Even small errors in the setup or calibration of the equipment can significantly impact the results.

In conclusion, while equations (2.83) and (2.67) describe the same thing, the differences in the results could be due to various factors such as experimental conditions, equipment used, and measurement techniques. It would be helpful to further analyze the equations and understand the underlying assumptions and experimental setups to better understand the differences in the results.
 

1. What is uncertainty analysis in 2 port measurement?

Uncertainty analysis in 2 port measurement is a process of quantifying and evaluating the potential errors and uncertainties associated with a measurement. It involves identifying and estimating the sources of uncertainty, and calculating the overall uncertainty for the measured values.

2. Why is uncertainty analysis important in 2 port measurement?

Uncertainty analysis is important in 2 port measurement because it allows for a more accurate and reliable assessment of the measured values. It also helps to identify and minimize potential sources of error, leading to more precise and trustworthy results.

3. How is uncertainty analysis performed in 2 port measurement?

Uncertainty analysis in 2 port measurement is typically performed by first identifying the sources of uncertainty, such as instrument limitations, environmental factors, and operator errors. Then, these uncertainties are quantified and combined to calculate the overall uncertainty using statistical methods.

4. What are the benefits of conducting uncertainty analysis in 2 port measurement?

Conducting uncertainty analysis in 2 port measurement can lead to improved accuracy and reliability of the measurement results. It also allows for better understanding of the measurement process and potential sources of error, leading to more informed decision making.

5. Are there any limitations to uncertainty analysis in 2 port measurement?

While uncertainty analysis is an important tool in 2 port measurement, it does have some limitations. It relies on assumptions and simplifications, and may not account for all sources of uncertainty. Additionally, it requires expertise and careful consideration of the measurement process, which can be time-consuming and costly.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
880
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
11
Views
31K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top