Understanding Null Energy Condition & Friedmann Equations

In summary: For instance, one could say that the NEC states that the total energy of the universe must be constant. If you take the absolute value of w then w would have to be less than -1, which would violate the NEC.
  • #1
Madster
22
0
Dear experts,

I really wonder how to extract the equation of stats [itex]w=\frac P \rho[/itex] from the Friedmann equations and how one can see that dark energy needs to have [itex]w<-\frac13[/itex] and why does [itex]w<-1[/itex] violate the null energy condition.

Thanks in advance,
madster
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Madster said:
Dear experts,

I really wonder how to extract the equation of stats [itex]w=\frac P \rho[/itex] from the Friedmann equations and how one can see that dark energy needs to have [itex]w<-\frac13[/itex] and why does [itex]w<-1[/itex] violate the null energy condition.

Thanks in advance,
madster

pressure = w * density (P = w * rho) is not extracted from the Friedmann equation. It's just an assumed equation that gives the equation of state, which is just how pressure changes with density.

If you look at Baez's "meaning of Einstein's equations" http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/einstein/, you'll note that if rho+3P is positive, a ball of inert coffee grounds around the matter satisfying that equation will start to contract.

But dark energy requires the ball of coffee grounds to expand, not contract.

Thus rho+3P must be negative, hence w must be less than -1/3.
 
  • #3
Madster said:
I really wonder how to extract the equation of stats [itex]w=\frac P \rho[/itex] from the Friedmann equations and how one can see that dark energy needs to have [itex]w<-\frac13[/itex]

I assume what you mean is how to extract the numerical value of w from observations. One of Friedmann's equations is [itex]\ddot{a}/a=(-4\pi/3)(\rho+3P)[/itex]. Since we observe that [itex]\ddot{a}/a[/itex] is positive, it follows that [itex]\rho+3P[/itex] is negative, and this forces w<-1/3.

Madster said:
and why does [itex]w<-1[/itex] violate the null energy condition.
The answer to this would depend on what definition you're using for the NEC. Depending on how you express the NEC, the result could be immediate.
 

Related to Understanding Null Energy Condition & Friedmann Equations

1. What is the Null Energy Condition (NEC)?

The Null Energy Condition is a principle in physics that states that the energy density at any given point in space cannot be negative. This condition is important in understanding the behavior of matter and energy in the universe.

2. How does the Null Energy Condition relate to the Friedmann Equations?

The Friedmann Equations are a set of equations that describe the evolution of the universe based on the energy and matter content. The Null Energy Condition is a fundamental principle in these equations, as it dictates the behavior of energy and matter in the universe.

3. Why is the understanding of the Null Energy Condition important in cosmology?

The Null Energy Condition is important in cosmology because it plays a crucial role in determining the expansion rate and overall dynamics of the universe. It also helps to constrain theoretical models and predictions about the evolution of the universe.

4. Can the Null Energy Condition be violated?

While the Null Energy Condition is a fundamental principle in physics, there are some theories and scenarios where it is believed to be violated. For example, in some theories of dark energy, the energy density may be negative, violating the NEC. However, these scenarios are still under investigation and have not been confirmed.

5. How do the Friedmann Equations help us understand the expansion of the universe?

The Friedmann Equations provide a mathematical framework for understanding the expansion of the universe. They take into account the effects of matter, energy, and the curvature of space, and can be used to make predictions about the future evolution of the universe. By solving these equations, scientists can gain insight into the behavior and fate of our universe.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
274
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
786
Back
Top