Understanding Relativity Concepts in Interstellar Space

In summary: There is no real concept that an object is "in" an inertial frame. A measurement or a statement *about* an object is what is "in" an inertial frame. So let's say the question is this: "If two non-rotating spaceships are floating freely in interstellar space well outside the influence of any other objects in the universe, then must both spaceships be at rest with respect to one another?" The answer is no. Either spaceship could be moving at constant velocity relative to the other, as allowed by Newton's first law.One more concept that is a a little fuzzy to me in general relativity is Black Holes and Gravitational waves from supernovae, based
  • #1
rg414
2
0
Hello everyone, I'm new to the forum and I'm starting to learn about Relativity. I'm confused about a couple of concept that I've recently been reading up on. If two non-rotating spaceships are floating freely in interstellar space well outside the influence of any other objects in the universe, then both spaceships must be in the same inertial frame or does the distance between the two spaceships must change at a constant rate. That part of relativity is a little confusing to me right now.

One more concept that is a a little fuzzy to me in general relativity is Black Holes and Gravitational waves from supernovae, based on experimental observations what has not been used to confirm one or another aspect of general relativity? This seems relatively simple, I don't think gravitational waves have been detected from a supernovae?

Hopefully someone can clear up this basic concept confusions, I'm having. I'm trying to build a strong foundation.

I look forward to staying a part of the forum, and contributing in the future.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi, rg414,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

rg414 said:
Hello everyone, I'm new to the forum and I'm starting to learn about Relativity. I'm confused about a couple of concept that I've recently been reading up on. If two non-rotating spaceships are floating freely in interstellar space well outside the influence of any other objects in the universe, then both spaceships must be in the same inertial frame or does the distance between the two spaceships must change at a constant rate. That part of relativity is a little confusing to me right now.
There is no real concept that an object is "in" an inertial frame. A measurement or a statement *about* an object is what is "in" an inertial frame. So let's say the question is this: "If two non-rotating spaceships are floating freely in interstellar space well outside the influence of any other objects in the universe, then must both spaceships be at rest with respect to one another?" The answer is no. Either spaceship could be moving at constant velocity relative to the other, as allowed by Newton's first law.

rg414 said:
One more concept that is a a little fuzzy to me in general relativity is Black Holes and Gravitational waves from supernovae, based on experimental observations what has not been used to confirm one or another aspect of general relativity? This seems relatively simple, I don't think gravitational waves have been detected from a supernovae?
There is strong empirical evidence for black holes, especially the supermassive one at the center of our galaxy. However, nobody has resolved the event horizon of a black hole, which would really be the smoking gun.

There is also strong empirical evidence for gravitational waves, from the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar. However, work is still under way to detect gravitational waves directly.

-Ben
 
  • #3
RedBlue_Pythag-1.jpg


Some physicists like to think of the Special Relativity effects simply as a consequence of the 4-dimensional structure of the universe. The upper left sketch represents two spaceships floating away from each other out in empty space. The motions of the red and blue ships are seen to be a manifestation of the orientation of the 4-dimensional ships in 4 dimensions. Each observer (blue and red) is living in a different 3-D cross-section view of the 4-D universe. At position 9 the blue guy's 3-D universe includes a 3-D cross-section view of the red rocket at position 8 (it looks to the blue guy that the red guy's clock is slow). However, when the red guy is at his position 9, his 3-D cross-section of the 4-D universe includes a 3-D cross-section of the blue rocket at the blue position 8 (it looks to the red guy that the blue guy's clock is slow). That's time dilation.

The length contraction is illustrated in the lower left sketch. At some instant of time the 3-D cross-section of the 4-D universe gives him a world in which the red rocket appears to be shorter than his own blue rocket.

The upper right sketch just presents a short graphical derivation of the time dilation equation. You need only the high school level Pythagorean theorem to develop this equation. Since the speed of light is a constant, c, it is implied that all observers move along their own X4 dimension at the speed of light (X4 = ct).
 
Last edited:
  • #4
rg414 said:
Hello everyone, I'm new to the forum and I'm starting to learn about Relativity. I'm confused about a couple of concept that I've recently been reading up on. If two non-rotating spaceships are floating freely in interstellar space well outside the influence of any other objects in the universe, then both spaceships must be in the same inertial frame or does the distance between the two spaceships must change at a constant rate. That part of relativity is a little confusing to me right now.
...
Hopefully someone can clear up this basic concept confusions, I'm having. I'm trying to build a strong foundation.

I look forward to staying a part of the forum, and contributing in the future.
In Special Relativity, every object that you want to consider is equally "in" every inertial frame of reference that you want to consider. If the distance between the two spaceships is not changing, then you can define an inertial frame of reference in which they are both stationary. You could also define an inertial frame of reference in which they are both traveling at any speed in any direction. Frames of reference are for our convenience in defining and analyzing problems and scenarios. They are merely spatial co-ordinate systems with time added.

If the distance between the two spaceships is changing at a constant rate, then you cannot come up with an inertial frame in which both spaceships are at rest, but you could do this for either one of them and then the other one will be in motion at a constant rate. Or you could pick the frame of reference that is "half way" between them and then they will each be traveling in the opposite direction at a constant speed (but not at one-half the relative speed, you have to use the relativistic addition of velocity formula to figure out what the exact speed will be). Or you could pick any other frame of reference with both spaceships moving at different speeds and different directions.

The important thing is that you should "view" both spaceships "in" the same inertial frame of reference, whichever one you want.
 

Related to Understanding Relativity Concepts in Interstellar Space

What is relativity?

Relativity is a theory developed by Albert Einstein that describes how objects in motion behave in the universe. It explains how time, space, and gravity are interconnected and how they affect each other.

How does relativity apply to interstellar space?

In interstellar space, where objects are moving at incredibly high speeds and in strong gravitational fields, the effects of relativity become more significant. The theory of relativity helps us understand and predict the behavior of objects in these extreme conditions.

What is the difference between special relativity and general relativity?

Special relativity deals with the behavior of objects moving at constant speeds in the absence of gravity. General relativity, on the other hand, takes into account the effects of gravity and describes how objects move in curved space-time.

Can relativity be proven or tested?

Yes, relativity has been extensively tested and has been proven to accurately describe the behavior of objects in our universe. Numerous experiments and observations have confirmed its predictions, such as the bending of light by massive objects and the time dilation of fast-moving particles.

Why is understanding relativity important for space travel?

Relativity is crucial for space travel because it allows us to accurately calculate and predict the behavior of objects in extreme conditions, such as during interstellar travel. Without understanding relativity, our understanding and ability to explore the universe would be severely limited.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
769
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
696
Back
Top