United States can't tell what it got for $1.2 billion spent on Iraqi police

  • News
  • Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date
  • Tags
    States
In summary, a new report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction reveals that the U.S. State Department mismanaged a $1.2 billion contract for Iraqi police training, and is unable to determine what it received for the money. The contract, awarded to DynCorp International LLC, was intended to provide housing, food, security, facilities, training, and equipment for the Iraqi Police Training Program. However, due to disarray in invoices and records, and inappropriate payments made to the contractor, auditors have suspended their review of the contract's implementation. This is not the first time that problems have been documented with both DynCorp and the agency overseeing the contract. The report also states that the Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
  • #1
fourier jr
765
13
no wonder Americans want to get the government off their back!

United States can't tell what it got for $1.2 billion spent on Iraqi police

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON - The U.S. State Department so badly managed a $1.2-billion contract for Iraqi police training it can't tell what it got for the money, a new report says.

Because of disarray in invoices and records on the project - and because the government is trying to recoup money paid inappropriately to contractor DynCorp International, LLC - auditors have temporarily suspended their effort to review the contract's implementation, said Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Stuart Bowen.

Bowen had been trying to review a February 2004 contract to DynCorp awarded by the State Department's Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs. The company was to provide housing, food, security, facilities, training support, law-enforcement staff with various specialties, as well as weapons and armour for personnel assigned to the program.

"I guess it's a familiar theme," Bowen said Monday, in that problems have previously been documented with both DynCorp and the agency overseeing the contract.

Although training has been conducted and equipment provided under the contract, the bureau is in the process of trying to organize and validate invoices and does not believe its records accurately show the reasons for most payments that were made, the report said.

"As a result, INL does not know specifically what it received for most of the $1.2 billion in expenditures under its DynCorp contract for the Iraqi Police Training Program," Bowen said in a new 18-page report.

*snip*
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2007/10/23/4597601-ap.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
fourier jr said:
no wonder Americans want to get the government off their back!


http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2007/10/23/4597601-ap.html


This is pretty typical.

The new Iraq war funding bill has $1.5 billion tacked on in the fine print to help the Mexican government fight the drug cartels. We have done this before and the money disappeared into the Mexican bureaurocracy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3



As scientists, it is important for us to base our conclusions on evidence and data. In this case, the evidence presented in the report suggests that there were significant issues with the management and oversight of the $1.2 billion contract for Iraqi police training. It is concerning that the State Department cannot accurately account for what was received for this large sum of money. This lack of accountability raises questions about the effectiveness and efficiency of the contract and the use of taxpayer dollars.

Furthermore, the report highlights the need for proper government oversight and management of contracts to ensure that funds are being used appropriately and effectively. It is understandable why Americans would want to see their government being more responsible with their tax dollars and ensuring transparency and accountability in their actions. As scientists, we support the use of evidence-based practices and proper management in all aspects of government spending. It is important for the government to learn from these mistakes and take steps to improve their processes to avoid similar issues in the future.
 

1. What was the purpose of spending $1.2 billion on Iraqi police?

The purpose of spending $1.2 billion on Iraqi police was to help stabilize and rebuild the police force in Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime. This was part of the larger effort to establish security and democracy in the country.

2. How was the $1.2 billion allocated and distributed?

The $1.2 billion was allocated and distributed through various programs and initiatives, including training and equipping Iraqi police forces, building police stations and facilities, and providing salaries and benefits for police officers.

3. Was the $1.2 billion spent effectively?

There is no clear answer to this question as there is limited information available on the specific outcomes and impact of the $1.2 billion spent on Iraqi police. Some reports suggest that progress was made in terms of rebuilding the police force and improving security, while others highlight instances of corruption and mismanagement.

4. What challenges were faced in spending the $1.2 billion on Iraqi police?

One of the main challenges faced in spending the $1.2 billion on Iraqi police was the unstable and volatile security situation in Iraq. This made it difficult to train and retain police officers, as well as to maintain and protect police facilities and equipment.

5. Is there any accountability for how the $1.2 billion was spent?

There is limited information available on the accountability of how the $1.2 billion was spent on Iraqi police. Some reports suggest that there have been investigations into allegations of corruption and mismanagement, but overall, there is a lack of transparency and oversight on the use of these funds.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top