Using a minimized nuclear reactor for further space travel

In summary, the conversation involved a theoretical design for a self-sufficient energy source for spacecraft. The idea was to use a minimized nuclear reactor to power the spacecraft and also use the energy collected from the reactor to power it again in a continuous cycle. However, this idea is not possible according to the rules against discussing perpetual motion and free energy in the forum.
  • #1
Interested user
8
14
TL;DR Summary
Is it possible to create a self sufficient particle collider that can produce enough energy to power a spacecraft as well as fit on one while still keeping the rockets weight light enough to allow lift off?
I have been thinking and I thought of a design that may, theoretically result in spacecraft being able to have a self sufficient energy source on board. Here’s my theory, if you have a minimized nuclear reactor (if building something like this is even possible given that the nuclear reaction must be stimulated precisely and cannot effect any of the reactors functions) and you put this reactor on a spacecraft and use the energy collected from the reactor to power the reactor again (this is the cycle that makes it self sufficient) and use at least some of said power for powering the spacecraft . Would something like this be at all possible? Please let me know.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
This might be of interest:

 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
  • #3
hutchphd said:
This might be of interest:


Thanks for this reference!
 
  • #4
Particle colliders use energy, not make it.
 
  • #5
Vanadium 50 said:
Particle colliders use energy, not make it.
AW ... spoilsport. There you go again, bringing reality into a nice fantasy about magic.
 
  • Haha
Likes Vanadium 50 and Klystron
  • #6
Interested user said:
you put this reactor on a spacecraft and use the energy collected from the reactor to power the reactor again (this is the cycle that makes it self sufficient)
We don't allow discussions of Over-Unity mechanisms and Perpetual Motion Machines, so this discussion is closed for now. From the PF Rules (see INFO at the top of the page):

Forbidden Topics said:
Pseudoscience, such as (but not limited to):
Perpetual motion and "free energy" discussions (see our Insights Article here)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
http://www.skepdic.com/freeenergy.html
http://www.skepdic.com/perpetual.html
 

1. What is a minimized nuclear reactor and how does it work?

A minimized nuclear reactor is a type of nuclear reactor that is designed to be smaller and more compact than traditional nuclear reactors. It uses nuclear fission to generate heat, which is then converted into electricity to power a spacecraft. The reactor uses a core of enriched uranium fuel surrounded by a neutron reflector and a coolant, typically liquid metal.

2. How can a minimized nuclear reactor be used for space travel?

A minimized nuclear reactor can be used for space travel by providing a reliable and long-lasting source of energy for spacecraft. This is especially useful for long-distance missions, where solar panels may not be able to provide enough power. The heat generated by the reactor can also be used for propulsion, allowing for faster and more efficient travel through space.

3. What are the advantages of using a minimized nuclear reactor for space travel?

There are several advantages to using a minimized nuclear reactor for space travel. It provides a more compact and efficient source of energy compared to traditional fuel sources. It also has a longer lifespan, allowing for longer missions without the need for refueling. Additionally, it can operate in extreme environments, such as the cold and dark conditions of deep space.

4. Are there any risks associated with using a minimized nuclear reactor for space travel?

Like any form of nuclear energy, there are risks associated with using a minimized nuclear reactor for space travel. These include the potential for accidents or malfunctions, which could release radioactive material into the environment. However, these risks can be minimized through proper design, testing, and safety protocols.

5. What are the ethical considerations of using a minimized nuclear reactor for space travel?

There are several ethical considerations to take into account when using a minimized nuclear reactor for space travel. These include the potential impact on the environment and other celestial bodies, as well as the potential for nuclear proliferation and weaponization. It is important for scientists and policymakers to carefully consider these ethical implications and ensure responsible use of this technology.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
806
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
428
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
26
Views
4K
Back
Top