- #1
Robin04
- 260
- 16
I have a few questions about the wave equation and the D'Alambert solution:
0) First of all, I'm a bit confused with the terminology. Wikipedia says that THE wave equation is a PDE of the form: ##\frac{\partial^2 u}{ \partial t^2 } = c^2 \nabla^2 u##, however there are other PDEs that have "wave-like" solutions like sine-Gordon, Klein-Gordon, etc., and I've seen books where these were called wave equations too. Is there an accepted definition of what a wave equation is?
1) Most of the text I've found about the derivation of the D'Alambert solution (for the equation mentioned above) starts with the idea of changing coordinates. In 1+1 dimensions ##(x,t) \rightarrow (u,s)##, where ##u = x+ct##, and ##s=x-ct##. I understand the physical motivation of this (it is like "jumping" on the wave and in that system the motion is the simplest), but are there any mathematical methods to determine what coordinate transformation do I have to do in order to get the simplest form of a PDE, without considering the physical meaning of the equation?
2) The final form of the D'Alambert formula is stated as (by WIkipedia): ##u(x,t) = \frac{f(x-ct) + f(x+ct)}{2} + \frac{1}{2c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g(s) ds##. I'm confused about how to apply the boundary conditions I choose. My idea is that the boundary value problem cannot be solved for any boundary conditions so it cannot be part of the formula for the general solution. Therefore this has to be some operation that I do on the solution after evaluating the D'Alambert formula. For example for the fixed boundary condition (lets say ##u(0,t)= u(L,t)=0##) I image I would have to multiply it with a function which has the value 0 at x=0, and x=L and some non-zero value (not sure what exactly) for the interval which is in between and far enough from the boundaries. How to do this properly with the most common boundary conditions?
3) One way to derive the wave equation(s?) is to take the continuum limit of a discrete system. If this discrete system is linear then its dynamics can be represented by a matrix and the symmetry transformations of the system can be determined by finding the matrices that commute with the dynamic matrix. Also, these matrices form a group. Is there an analogous phrasing of this in the case of (linear or maybe non-linear as well) PDEs?
0) First of all, I'm a bit confused with the terminology. Wikipedia says that THE wave equation is a PDE of the form: ##\frac{\partial^2 u}{ \partial t^2 } = c^2 \nabla^2 u##, however there are other PDEs that have "wave-like" solutions like sine-Gordon, Klein-Gordon, etc., and I've seen books where these were called wave equations too. Is there an accepted definition of what a wave equation is?
1) Most of the text I've found about the derivation of the D'Alambert solution (for the equation mentioned above) starts with the idea of changing coordinates. In 1+1 dimensions ##(x,t) \rightarrow (u,s)##, where ##u = x+ct##, and ##s=x-ct##. I understand the physical motivation of this (it is like "jumping" on the wave and in that system the motion is the simplest), but are there any mathematical methods to determine what coordinate transformation do I have to do in order to get the simplest form of a PDE, without considering the physical meaning of the equation?
2) The final form of the D'Alambert formula is stated as (by WIkipedia): ##u(x,t) = \frac{f(x-ct) + f(x+ct)}{2} + \frac{1}{2c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} g(s) ds##. I'm confused about how to apply the boundary conditions I choose. My idea is that the boundary value problem cannot be solved for any boundary conditions so it cannot be part of the formula for the general solution. Therefore this has to be some operation that I do on the solution after evaluating the D'Alambert formula. For example for the fixed boundary condition (lets say ##u(0,t)= u(L,t)=0##) I image I would have to multiply it with a function which has the value 0 at x=0, and x=L and some non-zero value (not sure what exactly) for the interval which is in between and far enough from the boundaries. How to do this properly with the most common boundary conditions?
3) One way to derive the wave equation(s?) is to take the continuum limit of a discrete system. If this discrete system is linear then its dynamics can be represented by a matrix and the symmetry transformations of the system can be determined by finding the matrices that commute with the dynamic matrix. Also, these matrices form a group. Is there an analogous phrasing of this in the case of (linear or maybe non-linear as well) PDEs?