What is the correct expression for the entropy of a gas with a potential wall?

In summary, the problem specifies that the mean energy is known, but doesn't specify what the mean energy is. The equation for the entropy should be able to accommodate for the energy from the wall, but doesn't seem to do so.
  • #1
aaaa202
1,169
2

Homework Statement


See the attached picture


Homework Equations


The equations given should be the relevant ones.


The Attempt at a Solution


I feel I got a bad intuition and understanding of this problem. I could eliminate T in favor of S and then express x and T by U and S. Is this how its supposed to be done? I don't think so, because I wonna use the information that the wall slides without friction at some point. Anyone have an idea what to do?
Also I don't agree with the expression for the entropy given. If you do a phase space integral to find the partition function you have to integrate over the walls position too, so you end up with an expression where T is not just raised to the power of 3N/2 but more (after all the 3N/2 is just an ideal gas in a container with fixed walls). Don't YOU agree on this?
 

Attachments

  • Gas.png
    Gas.png
    30.6 KB · Views: 442
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The information about the wall's position is contained in the volume in the equation for the entropy. That is, the volume of the gas will be the surface area of the wall times a linear length which contains the variable x. Your attachment doesn't specify what x is measured relative to, so I can't say for certain what that length scale is.

So, your equation for entropy seems like it should be fine, or at least approximately fine. Now you just need to use it to determine the equilibrium condition.

To do that, note that your problem states that system is isolated and the energy, U, is known. So, it sounds like the energy isn't changing, is that correct? If so, your equation for U then relates the temperature to the wall's position.
 
  • #3
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.
 
  • #4
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.
 
  • #5
aaaa202 said:
The problem is exactly that the problem only specifies that the mean energy is known. But I suppose that doesn't make a difference. The mean of the energy will in any case be the same at all times if the system is isolated, so indeed my equation for U relates the position of the wall to the temperature. Problem is then just that I have to specify the temperature too. Do I get that from the equation for the entropy? I still don't see how the expression for the entropy accommodates for the energy from the wall. If you calculate the partition function you would get an integral of exp(-x^2/T) which would make the partition function and thus the entropy different from the one of an ideal gas. I don't know - maybe it's gibberish.
Also x is measured from the bottom of the container.

If ##x## is the distance from the leftmost edge of the box to the movable wall, then the volume of the gas should just be ##V = Ax##, where A is the surface area of the movable wall. Then, the formula you are given would be ##S \sim N \ln(x T^{3/2})##. If that's the equation the problem gives you, you can just work with it by assumption to derive the final answer.

I don't have time to try and work out the partition function myself, so I can't really answer whether or not the factor ##\exp(-x^2/T)## that you calculate is correct or if gets canceled out by something, etc.

If U is not fixed, then I would guess that you need to use both the second law and the fact that the system will likely try to minimize its energy. By minimizing the energy, you could find a relation between x and T that you could insert into ##S##, which you could then maximize to find the final temperature and position.

You should post your calculation of the partition function. Perhaps someone else here will have time to go through it with you and see if they agree that the entropy expression given by the problem does not sufficiently describe the system.
 
  • #6
Here is my calculation of the partition function. The crucial point is that I sum over all positions of the wall (we might as well extend the integral to infinity) and multiply it by all states of each atom. I should think that is combinatorically correct, but its probably wrong.
 

Attachments

  • partition func.png
    partition func.png
    11.7 KB · Views: 410

Related to What is the correct expression for the entropy of a gas with a potential wall?

1. What is a gas with potential wall?

A gas with potential wall refers to a gas that is confined within a boundary or container with a potential energy barrier. This barrier prevents the gas particles from escaping and creates a potential energy well that the particles can move around in.

2. How does a potential wall affect the behavior of gas particles?

A potential wall can affect the behavior of gas particles in a few ways. It can restrict their movement and limit their kinetic energy, resulting in a lower temperature for the gas. It can also cause the particles to become more organized and form clusters or layers within the potential energy well.

3. What are the properties of a gas with potential wall?

A gas with potential wall exhibits properties such as a lower temperature, a confined volume, and a higher density compared to a gas without a potential wall. It also has a potential energy barrier that affects the behavior and movement of the gas particles.

4. How is a gas with potential wall different from an ideal gas?

An ideal gas is a theoretical concept that assumes the gas particles have no volume and do not interact with each other. On the other hand, a gas with potential wall is a more realistic model that takes into account the interactions between gas particles and their confinement within a potential energy well.

5. What are some real-world examples of gases with potential walls?

Real-world examples of gases with potential walls include gases confined in a container with a lid, such as a balloon or a gas cylinder. It can also refer to gases trapped in a porous material or a gas that is confined within a gravitational potential well, such as the Earth's atmosphere.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
936
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top