Which theory may explain paranormal phenonmena?

In summary, there are various theories proposed to explain PSI (paranormal phenomena) such as telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokinesis, near-death experiences, and apparitions. Some theories suggest that these phenomena are a result of dualism, while others relate it to quantum physics or electromagnetic waves. However, there is currently no solid evidence to support the existence of these phenomena. The idea of ETs and their motives also falls under this unproven premise and cannot be considered without concrete proof.
  • #1
forests
1
0
To those who are open to PSI existing. Which theory do you believe may explain PSI (paranormal phenomena) such as telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokinesis, near-death experiences or apparitions etc?

John Beloff a well known parapsychologist concluded that PSI occurs becuase of dualism ie the mind and brain are separate. Amit Goswami however in his book “The Self-Aware Universe”, lists some studies on quantum physics that may lead to an explanation of psi that agrees with the theory of a nonphysical and conceptual world. He explains that in quantum physics, objects are not seen as definite things. Instead, objects are possibilities, viewed as something called “possibility waves”. Of course his interpretation due to his research in quantum physics has lead him to formulate idealistic monism, that only consciousness exists in the universe and everything is part of it, he argues against dualism and materialism.

Others however have disagreed and put forward physical and materialistic theories to try and explain PSI.

Michael Persinger claims that much of paranormal phenomena can be explained by low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic waves.

Brian Josephson has claimed that the explanation of PSI may be found in quantum physics. Gerald Feinberg's concept of a tachyon, a theoretical particle that travels faster than the speed of light has been advocated by some parapsychologists who claim that it could explain some PSI phenomena.

Charles Tart however believes PSI is completey non-physical and does not operate to material laws.

There are many theories which try and explain PSI. Which one do you advocate and why? If any?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Read the rules specific to this subforum stickied above:
We will not consider questions that assume an unproven premise. For example, it is true that many people see UFOs - unidentified objects, lights, or fireballs of one sort or another - so we can consider the evidence for any particular alleged UFO event, however it is an unproven claim that any UFOs are crafts flown by aliens, so we will not consider questions such as: “What are ET's motives?", or “what information about ET is the government hiding?” If proven that ET is here, then we can consider what we might know about it, or what ET’s motives might be.
 
  • #3
forests said:
To those who are open to PSI existing. Which theory do you believe may explain PSI (paranormal phenomena) such as telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokinesis, near-death experiences or apparitions etc?

There is currently no shred of evidence that these phenomena that you list actually exist. Note that famous skeptic Randi has proposed $1000000 to anybody who can actually show paranormal activity. So far, nobody has been able to prove that these things exist.

Near-death experiences are real, but they can easily be explained by a malfunction in the brain. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-death_studies

This thread is now locked for not meeting the guidelines.
 

1. What is the most widely accepted theory for explaining paranormal phenomena?

The most widely accepted theory for explaining paranormal phenomena is the "psychological theory." This theory suggests that experiences of the paranormal are a result of psychological factors, such as suggestion, imagination, or memory distortion. It proposes that individuals may be more likely to experience paranormal phenomena if they have a strong belief in the paranormal or if they are in a heightened emotional state.

2. Can scientific theories be used to explain paranormal phenomena?

Although there have been attempts to use scientific theories, such as quantum mechanics, to explain paranormal phenomena, there is currently no scientific evidence to support these explanations. The scientific community generally does not accept paranormal phenomena as valid scientific concepts, and thus, there is no widely accepted scientific theory for explaining them.

3. How do cultural beliefs influence theories about paranormal phenomena?

Cultural beliefs can greatly influence theories about paranormal phenomena. For example, in cultures where belief in ghosts is common, paranormal experiences may be explained by the existence of ghosts. In contrast, in cultures where belief in ghosts is not prevalent, paranormal experiences may be attributed to different causes, such as psychological or physiological factors. Therefore, cultural beliefs can strongly shape the theories used to explain paranormal phenomena.

4. Are there any alternative theories for explaining paranormal phenomena?

Yes, there are alternative theories for explaining paranormal phenomena, such as the "paranormal theory" and the "skeptical theory." The paranormal theory suggests that paranormal experiences are caused by actual supernatural or paranormal forces, while the skeptical theory proposes that all paranormal experiences can be explained by natural or scientific explanations. These theories are not widely accepted by the scientific community, as there is no scientific evidence to support them.

5. Why is it difficult to find a single theory that can explain all paranormal phenomena?

It is difficult to find a single theory that can explain all paranormal phenomena because these experiences vary greatly and can be influenced by multiple factors, such as cultural beliefs, psychological factors, and individual interpretations. Additionally, the lack of scientific evidence for paranormal phenomena makes it challenging to develop a comprehensive theory that can explain all aspects of these experiences.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
61
Views
14K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
27
Views
2K
Back
Top