Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?

  • #1
SaschaSIGI
3
0
I am thinking why the following holds: Let f be a smooth function with f: Ω⊂R^m→R. Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?
Would be helpful if you are providing me some guidance or tips:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That set is the locus of function ##f##, and is a subset of ##\Omega\times \mathbb R##, which in turn is a subset of ##\mathbb R^{m+1}##.
By analogy with the locii of function from ##\mathbb R\to\mathbb R## ( a line, ie one-dimensional manifold in a 2D space), and from ##\mathbb R^2\to \mathbb R## (a surface or 2D manifold in a 3D space), we'd expect the set to be a ##m##-dimensional manifold.

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to, for any arbitrary point in the set, construct a homeomorphism from an open neighbourhood of the point to an open subset of ##\mathbb R^m##. If you can do that, you've proven the set is a ##m##-dimensional manifold.

Construction of that homeomorphism may involve the function ##f## in some way, or at least use its property of smoothness.

EDIT: Just realised the proposition is not true unless we require ##\Omega## to be a manifold. Consider where ##\Omega = \{0\} \cup [1,2]## and ##f(x)=x##. Then neither the domain nor the locus of ##f## is a manifold. They are each the union of a 0-dimensional manifold with a 1-dimensional manifold with boundary.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #3
SaschaSIGI said:
I am thinking why the following holds: Let f be a smooth function with f: Ω⊂R^m→R. Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?
Would be helpful if you are providing me some guidance or tips:)
The open set ##\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^m## with the standard coordinates is a coordinate patch in this graph, so the graph is a manifold
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #4
Proving this in the one dimensional case first is probably instructive if you're still lost.
 
  • #5
Basic principle: a graph is isomorphic to its domain. i.e. map x in the domain to (x,f(x)), and map back the point (x,f(x)) to x, via projection onto the "x axis".

remember this, it is very useful.
 
  • #6
IIRC, there are results regarding the Jacobian being nonzero.
 
  • #7
wrobel said:
The open set ##\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^m## with the standard coordinates is a coordinate patch in this graph, so the graph is a manifold
Why do you assume ##\Omega## is open?
 

1. What is a manifold?

A manifold is a mathematical concept that describes a space that locally resembles Euclidean space. In other words, it is a topological space that is locally flat and can be described by a set of coordinates.

2. Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} considered a manifold?

This set is considered a manifold because it satisfies the definition of a manifold. It is a topological space that is locally flat and can be described by a set of coordinates. In this case, the set is described by the function f(x) which maps the coordinates x and y.

3. What is the significance of this set being a manifold?

The significance of this set being a manifold is that it allows us to study and understand the behavior of the function f(x) in a structured and systematic way. Manifolds provide a framework for studying complex mathematical objects and have many applications in fields such as physics, engineering, and computer science.

4. How is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} related to the concept of smoothness?

This set is related to the concept of smoothness because the function f(x) is assumed to be a smooth function, meaning it has continuous derivatives of all orders. This ensures that the set is a smooth manifold, which allows for the use of advanced mathematical tools and techniques to analyze its properties.

5. Can this set be a manifold in higher dimensions?

Yes, this set can be a manifold in higher dimensions. In fact, the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} is a one-dimensional manifold, but the concept of manifolds can be extended to higher dimensions. For example, a two-dimensional manifold can be described by a surface in three-dimensional space, and a three-dimensional manifold can be described by a hypersurface in four-dimensional space.

Similar threads

  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
780
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
882
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
330
Back
Top