Why would FTL not be possible even in a noiseless place?

  • Thread starter San K
  • Start date
  • Tags
    even Ftl
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of coincidence counting in physics, specifically in relation to the possibility of faster-than-light (FTL) communication using entangled photons. The scenario involves Alice sending entangled photons to Bob and Charlie, and using a delayed choice quantum eraser to communicate information to Charlie. However, this approach is not feasible as Alice and Bob cannot control the behavior of their particle without breaking the entanglement, rendering FTL communication impossible.
  • #1
San K
911
1
I am illustrating this via both questions and an experiment both of which are conceptually are dealing with the same idea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincidence_counting_(physics )

Question:


1 a) if there were zero noise, and only single photon was sent, do we need a co-incidence counter?

1 b) is it practically possible to have zero noise?

2. if not, could we do FTL of information?


let's look at the below setup and tell me what i am missing (or wrong assumptions) in the logic below:

Alice, Bob and Charlie

Alice sends entangled photons to Bob and Charlie and a Delayed choice quantum eraser is setup between Bob and Charlie (and Alice).

Alice and Bob are sitting close by while Charlie is on a distant planet

Signal photon is going towards Bob and Idler towards Charlie

its decided that:

if Alice wants to communicate 1 to Charlie she creates a no-which-way pattern (interference)

if Alice wants to communicate 0 to Charlie she creates a which-way pattern (no-interference)

so now to communicate to Charlie, Alice and Bob work with the signal photon.

they want to send the information digit 1 to say Charlie FTL, so they pass the photon through the polarizer setup such that which-way info is erased.

Now when Charlie looks at his photon's behavior he sees that the photon is detected on the interference pattern bands...i.e. the photon lands up on one of the intereference bands...on his detector D

Note: before this was done, a million photons were sent earlier and thus the bands were formed...and marked on the detector.

Now after that...the above experiment was done where only 1 single photon was sent.

Since there is no noise (i.e. no photons from outside the experiement striking the detector) Charlie (alice and bob) don't need a co-incidence counter.

All charlie does is...watch where the photon struck. Did the photon lie on the interference band/fringes or between them? and he would know (with higher than 50% probability) what was done to the signal photon by alice and bob.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This approach fails for the same reason that so many other attempts to use entanglement for FTL communication fail: Alice and Bob cannot control the behavior of their particle without interacting with it and ending the entanglement. Thus Charlie will see the same pattern no matter what Alice and Bob do, and the effects of the entanglement will only be apparent when they compare notes after the fact.

(It is possible for Alice and Bob to things that affect the pattern that Charles observes - trivially they could block on of the slits - but in this case the message is being by carried by the photons themselves so there is no FTL involved).
 

1. Why can't objects travel faster than the speed of light?

The speed of light, also known as c, is the maximum speed at which all matter and information in the universe can travel. This is because as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely and would require an infinite amount of energy to continue accelerating. This is known as the theory of relativity, which has been extensively tested and confirmed by experiments.

2. What is the significance of the speed of light in the universe?

The speed of light is a fundamental constant in the universe and plays a crucial role in many physical phenomena. It is the speed limit for all forms of energy and information, including electromagnetic radiation, gravitational waves, and even hypothetical particles such as tachyons. This constant also helps us understand the behavior of matter and energy in the universe.

3. Can the speed of light be exceeded in a noiseless environment?

No, the speed of light cannot be exceeded in any environment, including a noiseless one. As mentioned before, the theory of relativity states that as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely, making it impossible for anything with mass to reach or exceed the speed of light.

4. How does the concept of space-time affect the possibility of faster-than-light travel?

According to Einstein's theory of relativity, space and time are interconnected and form a four-dimensional "fabric" called space-time. This fabric is curved by the presence of mass and energy, and the speed of light is the maximum speed at which anything can travel through this fabric. Therefore, the concept of space-time makes it impossible for anything to travel faster than the speed of light.

5. Is there any scientific evidence to suggest that faster-than-light travel is possible?

Currently, there is no evidence to support the idea of faster-than-light travel. Many experiments and theories, such as the theory of relativity and the laws of thermodynamics, suggest that it is impossible for objects to travel faster than the speed of light. Furthermore, no known technology or propulsion system can produce the amount of energy required to achieve such speeds.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
286
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
568
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
64
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top