Work Done by Elevator Cable in Sample Problem 7-6

AI Thread Summary
The work done by the gravitational force in the elevator problem is calculated as 59 kJ, while the work done by the elevator cable is found to be approximately -53 kJ, leading to a discrepancy with the textbook's answer of -47 kJ. The correct approach involves using Newton's second law to derive the tension in the cable and applying the work formula, resulting in the correct work done by the cable. The error in the initial calculation stemmed from incorrectly substituting values in the kinetic energy equation. The discussion highlights the importance of careful substitution and understanding the principles behind the calculations. The thread concludes with acknowledgment of the learning opportunity presented by the problem.
Soyuz42
Messages
2
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
An elevator cab of mass m=500 kg is descending with speed v_i=4.0 m/s when its supporting cable begins to slip, allowing it to fall with constant acceleration vec{a}=vec{g}/5 (Figure (a)).
The answer to "(a) During a fall through a distance d=12 m, what is the work done on the cab by the gravitational force vec{F_g}?" is 59 kJ. The answer to "(b) During the 12 m fall, what is the work W_T done on the cab by the upward pull of vec{T} of the elevator cable?" is -47 kJ, and the answer is arrived at by using the free body diagram in Fig. (b) to solve for T, and then using that to solve for W_T. using equation (1) below. My question pertains to (b): why do I get a different answer when I use the work-kinetic energy theorem?
Relevant Equations
(1) W=F*d*cos(phi)
(2) K_f = K_i + W (Work-kinetic energy theorem)
(3) W_g = mgd*cos(phi), where phi is the angle between force and displacement.
Fig. 7-10.png

As stated, part (a) says that the work done by the gravitational force ##\vec{F_g}## is 59 kJ. If ##W_T## is the work done by the elevator cable during the 12 m fall, then using the work-kinetic energy theorem,
\begin{align*}
K_f -K_i &= W_g + W_T\\
\frac12m({v_f}^2 - {v_i}^2) &= 59000 + W_T\\
\frac12m(a\Delta d)=5886&=59000 + W_T\\
W_T &\approx -53 \text{ kJ},
\end{align*}
while the answer quoted in the text is ##-47## kJ. Why is there a discrepancy?


Answer to (b) in the textbook

"A key idea here is that we can calculate the work ##W_T## with Eq. 7-7 (##W=Fd\cos\phi##) if we first find an expression for the magnitude ##T## of the cable's pull. A second key idea is that we can find that expression by writing Newton's second law for components along the ##y## axis in Fig. 7-10b (##F_{\text{net},y} = ma_y##). We get $$T-F_g=ma.$$ Solving for ##T##, substituting ##mg## for ##F_g##, and then substituting the result in Eq. 7-7, we obtain $$W_T=Td\cos\phi = m(a+g)d\cos\phi.$$ Next, substituting ##-g/5## for the (downward) acceleration ##a## and then ##180^\circ## for the angle ##\phi## between the directions of forces ##\vec{T}## and ##m\vec{g}##, we find
\begin{align}
W_T&= m\left(-\frac{g}{5} + g\right) d\cos\phi = \frac45mgd\cos\phi\nonumber\\
&=\frac45(500\text{ kg})(9.8 \text{ m/s^2})(12\text{ m})\cos 180^\circ\nonumber\\
&= -4.70\times 10^4 \text{ J} = -47 \text{ kJ}.\tag{Answer}
\end{align}
(The question and figure are from sample problem 7-6, pg. 149 of Fundamentals of Physics 7e, by Halliday et al.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, the method was fine, but I incorrectly substituted ##a\Delta d##, instead of ##2a\Delta d##, for ##{v_f}^2 - {v_i}^2##. I would save face but I do not know how to delete this thread.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and berkeman
Soyuz42 said:
Never mind, the method was fine, but I incorrectly substituted ##a\Delta d##, instead of ##2a\Delta d##, for ##{v_f}^2 - {v_i}^2##. I would save face but I do not know how to delete this thread.
No need to delete -- it's an interesting problem. Glad you figured it out.

Welcome to PhysicsForums! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS, Steve4Physics and Soyuz42
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top