Zapping a semiconductor with a laser

BeauGeste
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
If you zap a n-type semicond. with a laser with energy at, say, the band gap, what happens to the donor electrons? For sake of argument, let's say we're at low temp. where the occupation of electrons on donors is high. I know technically, you should only get transitions at the energy of the laser (top of vb to bottom of cb), but do you think that in reality the donor electrons (if shallow enough) would be ripped from their impurity sites? And then 'reattach' after a equilibrating time.
Does anyone know what happens?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BeauGeste said:
If you zap a n-type semicond. with a laser with energy at, say, the band gap, what happens to the donor electrons? For sake of argument, let's say we're at low temp. where the occupation of electrons on donors is high. I know technically, you should only get transitions at the energy of the laser (top of vb to bottom of cb), but do you think that in reality the donor electrons (if shallow enough) would be ripped from their impurity sites? And then 'reattach' after a equilibrating time.
Does anyone know what happens?

Based on experimental results at RT with a CW dye laser at 600 nm (~1.5 eV) the electrons at the Si 2p level moved ~1.2 eV while the laser was turned on at the same time that an XPS instrument with its X-ray beam was measuring the Si 2p signal. GaAs responded similarly but with a lower shift.
 
Buckeye said:
Based on experimental results at RT with a CW dye laser at 600 nm (~1.5 eV) the electrons at the Si 2p level moved ~1.2 eV while the laser was turned on at the same time that an XPS instrument with its X-ray beam was measuring the Si 2p signal. GaAs responded similarly but with a lower shift.


The 2p level is the donor level? What is an XPS instrument and what does it mean to measure the Si 2p signal?
 
BeauGeste said:
The 2p level is the donor level? What is an XPS instrument and what does it mean to measure the Si 2p signal?

Based on current thinking the 2p does not contribute significantly to the donor level. But it does interact with the donor level and all other levels through "configuration interaction".

If you visit Wikipedia, you can find the XPS article that I am the main author of. It may help. The technique sends X-rays (1486 eV) into a sample. The X-rays interact with the atoms and electrons near the surface that have less than 1486 eV of binding energy will come out into the ultra-high vacuum of the instrument.

The Si 2p signal indicates that the 2p electrons have ~100 eV of binding energy. The Si 2s occurs at 150 eV. The Si 3s occurs at ~8 eV and the Si 3p occurs at ~3 eV. The 3s and 3p electron levels are the main contributors to the donor level. Then there are the free electrons etc.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top