Recent content by 215

  1. 2

    Design a PID Controller for System G(s) w/ 0% Overshoot & <1s Settling Time

    since this is just trial model it would be possible to do it. but since the real model cannot become marginal stable, is the method unuseable.
  2. 2

    Design a PID Controller for System G(s) w/ 0% Overshoot & <1s Settling Time

    but it's not possible to make one using a PI which have these values.
  3. 2

    Design a PID Controller for System G(s) w/ 0% Overshoot & <1s Settling Time

    I can see that it changes, but how can i prevent it? i mean shouldn't they have some conditions aswell??
  4. 2

    Design a PID Controller for System G(s) w/ 0% Overshoot & <1s Settling Time

    but how come do they affect the system.. mean if a zero is dominant, would it then act as an dominant pole??.. But still the zero does not contain a imaginary part, which still make no sense why it should oscillate, and create overshoot.
  5. 2

    Design a PID Controller for System G(s) w/ 0% Overshoot & <1s Settling Time

    how would zero be able to affect a system... as far I've understood is it only the poles which affects the system.
  6. 2

    Design a PID Controller for System G(s) w/ 0% Overshoot & <1s Settling Time

    I just don't understand how come i canont determine my PID values, from where i want my poles placed.. I've solved ch. eq. for all possible controllers and PD seems to be the only one capable of given me poles at those two locations.
  7. 2

    Design a PID Controller for System G(s) w/ 0% Overshoot & <1s Settling Time

    Yes.. but even for an overdamped system it doesn't resemble the charateristica of an overdamped system... In[959]:= Solve[10 x^2 + 120 x + 350 == 0, x] Out[959]= {{x -> -7}, {x -> -5}} There is no complex component.
  8. 2

    Why does this step response overshoot?

    I tried to make a general problem, but seems to have forgotten where it began at. I posted my problem on another forum. http://snag.gy/OqhxH.jpg I hope this helps. My repsponse criterias is that I want an overshoot to be 0% and settling time be under 1 sec. Using Matlab tuning application...
  9. 2

    Why does this step response overshoot?

    How should i using a PID controlle be able to adjust the Zero location, while i am adjusting the location of the pole.
  10. 2

    Why does this step response overshoot?

    but what criteria should i apply for determining the zeroes, and how does it affect the system. I mean it is still a LHP zero? so bad can't it be
  11. 2

    Why does this step response overshoot?

    But how come does zeroes apply overshoot? I thought it was only poles which affected the system
  12. 2

    Why does this step response overshoot?

    but ... http://snag.gy/0eODb.jpg how come??
  13. 2

    Design a PID Controller for System G(s) w/ 0% Overshoot & <1s Settling Time

    Homework Statement Design a controller for the system G(S) such, that the step response to close loop transfer function has an overshoot of 0% and a settling time of less than 1 sec. Homework Equations G(s) = \frac{1}{10s^2 + 5s + 10} Controller has to be a PID controller. The Attempt...
  14. 2

    Why does this step response overshoot?

    I have this transfer function which i don't know why it is overshooting due to an step input. http://snag.gy/Vh1SM.jpg Could someone explain why it does that. It's it a close loop transfer function, where I've designed a controller for it, but for some reason, eventhoug all my poles...
  15. 2

    Controlled system - Closed loop system

    I have this assignment (First problem - exercise 2 - dias 7) http://site.iugaza.edu.ps/bhamed/files/2010/02/L4-Root-Locus.ppt Which i am having some problems solving. I am stuck at B) So far i tried to solve the problem, by calculating the distance from origin to the breakaway point, by...
Back
Top