Recent content by alvielwj

  1. A

    Help with Heine-Borel Theorem: Why No Subcollection Cover?

    I think you are using the result to prove the question . you mentioned that t is closed and bounded,then processing to prove in the way T is bounded and closed... If you using S instead of T , your prove still hold. "Now consider an open cover of T. Then add to that cover the open set V:=R\T...
  2. A

    Help with Heine-Borel Theorem: Why No Subcollection Cover?

    Thank you. I think I need some times to understand the last step" Of that subcover, keeping only the U_i's (that is to say, removing V if it in a member of the subcover)"
  3. A

    Help with Heine-Borel Theorem: Why No Subcollection Cover?

    I need to prove every every open cover of T has a finite subcover. My version of Heine-Borel theorem is every open cover of a closed interval has a finite subcover. It is easy to prove if it is a closed interval. I mean like [a,b] not a interval like T.
  4. A

    Help with Heine-Borel Theorem: Why No Subcollection Cover?

    but how to prove that every open cover of T has a finite subcover
  5. A

    Help with Heine-Borel Theorem: Why No Subcollection Cover?

    I know that I can find a cover e.g Ia=(1/n,1+1/n),union of Ia from n=1 to inifinte is a cover for S but not finite
  6. A

    Help with Heine-Borel Theorem: Why No Subcollection Cover?

    I am studying Heine-Borel theorem. I finally get the sense of this theorem after i read a lots posts here. But I found a question posted by Rach3 why for S={1,1/2,1/3……} there is no subcollection of it is a cover of S but every open cover of T={0,1,1/2,1/3……} has a finite subcover?
  7. A

    Show Boundedness of Entire Function f: f(z) = f(z + 2π ) & f(z + 2π i)

    Thank you for your answer.. I finally know how to use the hint.. At the beginning i really don't know how to start..
  8. A

    Show Boundedness of Entire Function f: f(z) = f(z + 2π ) & f(z + 2π i)

    let me post the whole question Suppose that f is an entire function such that f(z) = f(z + 2π ) and f(z) = f(z + 2π i) for all z belong to C. Use Liouville's theorem to show that f is constant. Hint: Consider the restriction of f to the square {z = x + iy : 0 <x < 2π ; 0 < y <2π }
  9. A

    Show Boundedness of Entire Function f: f(z) = f(z + 2π ) & f(z + 2π i)

    need to prove f(z) is constant. first show f is bounded,then by the Liouville's theorem, f is constant
  10. A

    Show Boundedness of Entire Function f: f(z) = f(z + 2π ) & f(z + 2π i)

    How to show that if f is an entire function,such that f(z) = f(z + 2π ) and f(z) = f(z + 2π i) for all z belong to C. π is pi.
  11. A

    Real and complex canonical forms

    A question about how find the canonical forms over R and C. An example, given a quadratic form,q(x,y,z)=x^2 + 2xy + 4yz + z^2 find the canonical forms over R and C. First step,i get the matrix 1 2^0.5 0 2^0.5 0 2...
  12. A

    Counting Quadratic Forms on Fp^n: Exploring the Field of p Elements

    are there infinite many quadratic forms on the vector space R^n ?
  13. A

    Counting Quadratic Forms on Fp^n: Exploring the Field of p Elements

    For an odd prime number p let Fp be the field with p elements, ie. the integers {0...,p-1} with addition and multiplication defined modulo p. How many quadratic forms are there on the vector space Fp^n I don even know how to start this question
  14. A

    Directional Derivative of w on Intersection of Surfaces

    AH, finally,i figured it out , thank a lot
  15. A

    Directional Derivative of w on Intersection of Surfaces

    Why do we calculate the gradient vectors of the surfaces? What is the geometrical meaning of gradient vector? I think I should calculate the normals of two surfaces and get the cross product of two normals, because the vector of the intersection curve is perpendicular to both of the normals..
Back
Top