Recent content by annawells

  1. A

    Galois theory. field extension, constructible/algebraic numbers

    ohhhh :( okay I will think about it! does anything make a difference that K contains complex numbers no?
  2. A

    Galois theory. field extension, constructible/algebraic numbers

    okay. sooo, the argument is that: If z is constructible then its minimal polynomial has a degree which is a power of 2. For z = 2^(1/p), z has minimal polynomial i(z^p)-2, which has degree p (which is obviously not a power of 2). So z is not constructible. Is it obvious to say that...
  3. A

    Galois theory. field extension, constructible/algebraic numbers

    okay thanks! is there some lemma/theorem that states that these numbers are not constructable?? for either pth root of 2, or cube root of p?!
  4. A

    Galois theory. field extension, constructible/algebraic numbers

    Thanks, that makes sense! So you are looking at all the pth roots for p prime yeh? and each extension has a degree of 2? so with some application of towers law (which says that for M<N<L, [L:M] = [L:N]*[N:M] ) we get that its infinite. Instead of adding all the elements pth root of 2, would...
  5. A

    Galois theory. field extension, constructible/algebraic numbers

    Homework Statement Let K be the subfield of all constructible numbers in C Let A be the subfield of all algebraic numbers in C Is the field extension A:K finite? The Attempt at a Solution I don't know where to start! I have read and understood proofs that all constructible numbers...
  6. A

    Finding the residue of a singularity

    okay, thanks a lot! i didnt know that thing about g(z)/z , thanks. but then, what is the residue at the singularity? its the coefficient of the "1/z" term, and here that looks to be g(z) though its not exactly a coefficient,its a series!
  7. A

    Finding the residue of a singularity

    Thanks, I was wondering how people made the functions look nice on here! i have often found answers here, but never posted before; thanks for the welcome :-) well, when z --> 0, we have the zf(z)--> -1 i am not sure what that says about the nature of a function? if 0 were a simple pole...
  8. A

    Finding the residue of a singularity

    Thanks for the idea. I am not quite sure how to pursue it. To show it is an essential singularity, don't i need to "produce" the laurent series, or at least show that it has infinite negative terms? I don't know how to break up the fraction to do that!? maybe this is more of a problem with my...
  9. A

    Finding the residue of a singularity

    Homework Statement The following function has a singularity at z=0 (e^z)/(1 - (e^z)) decide if its removable/a pole/essential, and determine the residue The Attempt at a Solution I played with the function and saw it can be re-written as: -1 /(z + z^2/2! + z^3/3! +...) In this...
Back
Top