okay. sooo, the argument is that:
If z is constructible then its minimal polynomial has a degree which is a power of 2.
For z = 2^(1/p), z has minimal polynomial i(z^p)-2, which has degree p (which is obviously not a power of 2). So z is not constructible.
Is it obvious to say that...
Thanks, that makes sense! So you are looking at all the pth roots for p prime yeh? and each extension has a degree of 2? so with some application of towers law (which says that for M<N<L, [L:M] = [L:N]*[N:M] ) we get that its infinite.
Instead of adding all the elements pth root of 2, would...
Homework Statement
Let K be the subfield of all constructible numbers in C
Let A be the subfield of all algebraic numbers in C
Is the field extension A:K finite?
The Attempt at a Solution
I don't know where to start! I have read and understood proofs that all constructible numbers...
okay, thanks a lot! i didnt know that thing about g(z)/z , thanks. but then, what is the residue at the singularity? its the coefficient of the "1/z" term, and here that looks to be g(z) though its not exactly a coefficient,its a series!
Thanks, I was wondering how people made the functions look nice on here! i have often found answers here, but never posted before; thanks for the welcome :-)
well, when z --> 0, we have the zf(z)--> -1
i am not sure what that says about the nature of a function? if 0 were a simple pole...
Thanks for the idea.
I am not quite sure how to pursue it. To show it is an essential singularity, don't i need to "produce" the laurent series, or at least show that it has infinite negative terms? I don't know how to break up the fraction to do that!? maybe this is more of a problem with my...
Homework Statement
The following function has a singularity at z=0
(e^z)/(1 - (e^z))
decide if its removable/a pole/essential, and determine the residue
The Attempt at a Solution
I played with the function and saw it can be re-written as: -1 /(z + z^2/2! + z^3/3! +...)
In this...