Recent content by anuj

earlier site address not ok, see https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=33217

For further details, please visit this site https://www.physicsforums.com/archive/t-33217_Interference_in_time.html The question I posted under this tread was Is it possible to interfere two light waves in the time domain? Does anyone has come across an experiment like this? 1. Treat...

Recently Paulus and his team had reported observation of interference in time. http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/9/3/1/1?rss=2.0 http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0503165 It is a marvellous experiment. But, it appears the work is not fully explained and the experimental results need careful...

I had started a thread 'Interference in Time' on this topic last year www.physicsforums.com/archive/topic/t-33217_Interference_in_time.html

This thread was started in July 04 with the view to understand if interference in time is possible. I am surprised to see that a group of scientists have recently observed this effect. One can see the site http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/9/3/1/1?rss=2.0

Let me take the discussion to a more fundamental lavel. We know that every effect needs a cause to create it. And every effect is a cause in itself for the subsequent effects. Those who know the Huygens principle (wave theory of light) can easily understand it. The principle says that every...

We know that the energy cannot be created or destroyed but can only be converted into another form. Does the same also applies to information. Is it possible to create the information out of nothing or destroy it completely without leaving a trace of it. This question is with regard to the...

I agree that at present we need to be worried about the 4 dimensions as we know. From your earlier replies I got the impression that experience has nothing to do with the five body sensors that is eye, ear, nose, tounge and skin. If I correctly understand your views, our experiences are all due...

If experience is something which need to be felt and cannot be explained, not even thought of, then how do we propose to link the consciousness with the 11 dimensional understanding of the physical universe.

For a moment, even if it is assumed that thinking isn't necessary to experience our own existence, what is that experience about. Is it having any shape, sound, taste or if not what else. Or is it just a void feeling like a singularity in the universe.

To experience our own existence, what do we need if not our thinking?

Possibly, there are three states in which we can understand consciousness. And in all the three states, our mind has to be disassociated from our body. The consciousness is beyond the understanding of our five body sensing organs. It can only be understood by mind and that too an unperturbed...

No doubt, the consciousness is beyond the materialistic realm. However, it is incorrect to assume that science and sprituality are two milestones on the same road that explains the very existence of human beings. In all probability, the science and religion both coexist as two separate roads and...

The mind disassociated with the body and having no thought what-so-ever except the one and only one that we still exist. Is it what we call consciousness?

If the life (the thought activity of our brain) does not start with its birth, we need to know at what stage it starts. I mean the evolution of our thought process starting from zero thought in the begining.