Recent content by Apak

I know it might not make sense, but it is boolien logic or on/off operations. Is=on or (1) and is not=off or (0). You may consider the premises to be is=is and is=not. In other words when you have 1 of a thing you have 1 of a thing, and when you have 0 of a thing you do not have a true 0...

Didn't want to include the key, mostly because it would require to much typing. However, I will do the 1's and 0's and hopefully that should clear some things up. In accordance, that which is and is not { is=1, is not=0} is-is and is-not {1=1, 1=0} is-not is not: not {1=0 does not...

Since I' ve never studied logic I was wondering if one of you kind people could help me out on something I'm working on. I'm going to include definitions and values, but no key. The reason I'm not including a key is that it should read reasonably well without one. Definitions: si -...

Yes, you could define all actions as evil, in that since Good is not actually present all actions which exist below it are intrinsically less Good or evil. I think everyone can see why I prefer evil relative good/Good instead of the whole system being evil due to lack of Good; either way its...

I classify all actions as being good. However, some actions appear as relative evil due to the lack of Good within the system. So evil appears relative to good due to lack of Good.

Lets take the position attribute. To my understanding this attribute does not exist until it is measured. Now I don't know how its measured but it does not hold any particular value until it is measured unlike static attributes such as charge. So I guess you can define the reality created as...

Before I begin I feel that I should state that I have only a passing amount of knowledge on the subject so if I've got something wrong let me know. My current understanding of QM is that certain atomic attributes are created through observation of these attributes. This seems to suggest that...