Recent content by CasualCalculus
-
C
Undergrad Mass/Density Increase in Motion: Relativistic or Observable?
I don't need to answer that question as I get your point and I understand Galilean physics thank you. I asked a deliberately simple question - it would have been better phrased as 'what are the physical properties of space-time other than gravity? - I.e. what effects does space-time have on...- CasualCalculus
- Post #9
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
C
Undergrad Mass/Density Increase in Motion: Relativistic or Observable?
I fully get where you're coming from, the basis for asking my question is I'm trying to understand if there are any physical properties of spacetime and I didn't want to assume that mass/density follows the same relativistic nature as time, although it seemed like it should. From the looks of...- CasualCalculus
- Post #7
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
C
Undergrad Mass/Density Increase in Motion: Relativistic or Observable?
Sorry I've seen the term 'at rest' used in several forums and always assumed it as a short hang for 'at rest relative to something else' - I thought that was implied in what I wrote. Secondly so I'll take it that the change in your own mass and density is not something you could say physically...- CasualCalculus
- Post #5
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
C
Undergrad Mass/Density Increase in Motion: Relativistic or Observable?
Okay all the above points accepted (I'll read that thread - I was not aware relativistic mass was an outdated subject). But for my benefit (as an interested layman) as time of a object slows as it approaches the speed of light (relative to an object at rest) - say a person in a spaceship - they...- CasualCalculus
- Post #3
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
C
Undergrad Mass/Density Increase in Motion: Relativistic or Observable?
Is the increase in mass/density of an object in motion purely relativistic? What I mean is if you were in a spaceship approaching the speed of light would you be able to measure a change in your mass/density or would the change only be observable to someone at rest. I'm aware of the Lorentz...- CasualCalculus
- Thread
- General General relativity Relativity
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
C
Graduate Have I just invented a new axiom?
Yeah, hubris took hold before I checked it with x = -1- CasualCalculus
- Post #9
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
C
Graduate Have I just invented a new axiom?
Ah a classic example of a tongue-in-cheek post title being met with derision and scorn (it was a play on the classic "HAVE I JUST INVENTED A NEW FORMULA?!" posts you get on things like this. I am genuinely interested if anyone has seen this pattern before because this is the first time I came...- CasualCalculus
- Post #7
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
C
Graduate Have I just invented a new axiom?
No more than it's an interesting pattern and I thought I'd post out of curiosity as to whether seen it before.- CasualCalculus
- Post #3
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
C
Graduate Have I just invented a new axiom?
I doubt it but I was doing some work on trying to remove time from Classical Physics (just for the hell of it) and I came across a formula that made me go "huh, not seen that before, but it's kind of neat." Just out of curiosity has anyone seen this formula before? X = √ ((X/2Π) * (X*2Π))- CasualCalculus
- Thread
- Axiom
- Replies: 10
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics