Recent content by Chelle12

You already found out yourself why my argument makes sense. Working doesn't mean a thing if the work you do is useless. Instead of whining, I think it would be more helpful if you seriously considered the suggestions I made, and see if there is any sense in them or not. Now that would be...

Ansgar, I have no problem if you disagree, but this comment of yours is uncalled for.

If I suggest that there is energy released, it could be that the Higgs-field surrounding the collisions area gets to be more energised, or Jets might contain more striking-force than is expected.

It's about getting kinetic energy out of it, let me pour it into a dialog: The_house: To get extra kinetic energy, you would have to end up with particles that have less total mass. Ansgar: the mass of the sum of particles is different then proton of course. The_house: but conservation...

No, "Lifetime vs. Existence" - "Longer vs. Bigger" - "Configuration vs. Organism", whatever, it's all the same, focus on the idea. Indeed, but that's not in line with what "the_house" said:

Could it also be seen like a "drafting" mechanism, in a sea of particles, where the configuration of 3 quarks has a bigger and almost endless existence: [PLAIN]http://users.skynet.be/michelvandegaer/BelgischerKreisel.gif http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drafting_(aerodynamics) Wouldn't the...

A quark on it's own last a fraction of a second, one in a proton infinitely, I think the difference is quite clear.

I was referring to nuclear particles, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_quark" The Standard Model predicts its lifetime to be roughly 5×10^−25 s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton" Protons are observed to be stable and their empirically observed half-life is at least 6.6×10^35 yr. Yes...

As you wish, but we see nuclei that remain stable for billions of years, but, if that nuclei had one more particle in it, the forces put upon its particles cause them to decay with a half-life of seconds. There is an infinite energy difference between these compositions. Why is that? If the...

Indeed I have little understanding, but there is one thing that puzzles me. A proton is some sort of organism/mechanism that has a charge, and when collided and smashed into pieces it's mass and energy is divided over the different parts, due to the conservation of energy. But for most organisms...

A proton is a subatomic particle with an electric charge of +1 elementary charge. So all the particles and the interaction within the proton form globally a positive force (charge) of +1.

I have a better formulation; what I meant is, what happens with the global positive force that a proton has. Isn't there a factor such as "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" that needs to be taken into account when colliding particles?

Is there such a thing as "bosonized", like in the sense of "ionized", where matter can become more charged?

I wasn't suggesting they would bump into each other. I just wanted to have an idea what the distance, definite positions, between these single waves are in a normal ray of light or a laser beam. Thus when light "travels", and before the distances get bigger when they disperse.

ok, when light travels in a ray of light, isn't there some distance between them, otherwise I guess it wouldn't be quanta. Or when a laser is beamed towards the moon for measurement, the light disparses, so distance would increase. In an experiment done with a single photon counting CCD camera...