Thanks
Hi guys
Thanks for all the help- this suggestion from Zonde is exactly what I'm looking for. It's a very clear description of a rigourous experiment. Thanks Zonde
Also big thanks to Peter Morgan; I do have access to a University library, so I should be able to get copies of many...
Reply to Dr Chinese
Hi Dr Chinese
Ok, I've spent some time with the paper you recommended
(http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0205/0205171v1.pdf).
I admit that the maths is beyond me, but if I understand the experimental set-up correctly, a count is only made if both entangled...
Thanks Javier for that link
The paper refers to the orthogonal polarisation of entangled photons as a known fact, rather than actually demonstrating it... however, what an elegant experiment! It is this kind of bizarre behaviour that has sparked my interest in the field of quantum...
Thanks Dr Chinese
The paper you linked to does seem to be what I'm looking for... though I'm finding parts of it hard to understand, I'm going to persevere as you recommend.
Incidentally, it was reading your explanation of Bell's inequalities that led me to post my question. Your...
Hi
I've been struggling to understand entanglement for some time now, and find that most explanations assume some basic knowledge that I don't have. Please could somebody help clear up a very basic query for me?
If two photons are entangled, and we have no knowledge of their state of...
Hi
Can anybody direct me to a full explanation of the many-worlds theory, as proposed by Hugh Everett to replace the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics? I'm looking for something comprehensible to a layman, not too heavy on the maths if possible.
Specifically, I wish to...