Recent content by d9090

Okay.. Both CM and QM says "position" and "momenta" are different. They're mathematically used differently, and operationally defined differently. The experimental data for a "position" (point) and a "momentum" (two or more points with or without "path") are different. So why is it that...

If the action of Mass is quantized, then so must be the action of a "particle" with Mass on Space-Time, and the action of Space-Time on a "particle" with Mass. Continuous Space-Time makes the mathematics easier; discrete Space-Time is closer to a "realistic" theory were the "action" known as...

I now have a short answer as well.. "What Steve Rado said." I just discovered his work.. I've been looking 30 years for something like his "Aethro-Kinematics" From what little ived read so far, there are slight differences but basically substitute "Aethrons" for Beon-emergent Hp/w and all...

Okay.. but this probably isn't the right place. I am working on a website and trying to convert my notes and drawing over to .html and .jpg. But it amounts to quite a few pages and working time is limited. Here is a crude first draft of abstract... === start of abstract text === BVC...

I have rolled my own GUT and TOE. I am not a physicist or mathematician (or a religious freak or mysical New Age advocate, etc) but will be considered a kook. Offered for what its worth, though... here is the most fundamental statement of the TOE held in my "Beon-Void Conjecture"...

[Off topic] S.Daedelus... Thank you for the links to the Jegerlehner and Levin/Wen papers. IMHO, an "aether" does exist, but by definition cannot be Observed because a) aether particles cannot emit field-forces; and b) the all observations of physical phenomena (e.g., by an intelligent...