Recent content by Dale

Agreed. You could design circuits with a superconducting component and a long time constant and you could design circuits with a superconducting component and a short time constant. So this personal-opinion-in-place-of-evidence approach is not a sound basis on which to claim a contradiction

What analysis? All I have seen is your unfounded assertions to that effect. Indeed. Please do.

Ramping up a MRI magnet is almost linear, it takes a few hours which is not almost forever, and I don’t see what you think is contrary to what in any of that. You are making random assertions of some contradiction, please post the professional scientific reference that describes the actual...

This depends on the geometry but is typically in the range of 50 to 300 ohms.

Hmmm. What makes you think that? Do you have a reference that shows an experiment where it doesn’t match?

As @renormalize mentioned, you have arbitrarily high frequencies for switching on an ideal source.

The time constant will depend on the radiation resistance of the superconductor. Superconductors have no resistance at DC, but at high frequencies they do have resistance and effective resistance.

That is a depressingly standard excuse. Best of luck

This will not impress anyone, and makes it much more likely that the content is already well understood. You should start by fixing that before anything else

I publish in the medical technology literature and it was all journal first. I think that it is common in physics to post to arxiv at the same time that you submit to a journal

Desk rejections are not done because the paper comes from an “outsider”. They are usually done because the submitter did not follow the journal’s instructions for authors or because the paper doesn’t fit the journal. They are also often done because the style of the paper is not professional or...

Yes. No. No. The flashes are simultaneous in at most one frame. That frame will report them as being simultaneous, others will not.

All of our experiments done to date over more than a century indicate that reality is accurately described by special relativity on a local scale.

I would simply submit your research to a journal. Usually a good indication of which journal to submit to is the journal that was the source for most of your research. Although you surely studied hundreds of papers in a dozen journals, focus on the journal that you returned to most frequently.

This is shown in Jackson's 2002 paper "From Lorenz to Coulomb and other explicit gauge transformations" (Am J Phys, 35:832-837). Basically, he shows that in the Coulomb gauge $$-\frac{\partial \mathbf A_C}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int d^3 x' \left( \frac{[\rho]}{R^2}\mathbf{\hat R}...