Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
DaveC426913's latest activity
DaveC426913
reacted to
Herman Trivilino's post
in the thread
Is this an oversimplification? (treating a lens as a set of prisms)
with
Like
.
The larger the number of prisms, the better the approximation. But the surface of each prism is perpendicular to the normal at the...
Jul 28, 2025
DaveC426913
reacted to
Ibix's post
in the thread
Is this an oversimplification? (treating a lens as a set of prisms)
with
Like
.
I think the message the book is trying to convey is that lenses work on the same principles of refraction that prisms do, and that the...
Jul 28, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
Is this an oversimplification? (treating a lens as a set of prisms)
.
Again, it seems to achieve its goal quite well. I don't really understand what the objection is. Three prisms is sufficient to prove...
Jul 28, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
Is this an oversimplification? (treating a lens as a set of prisms)
.
Does it not do that? It seems to do that quite well.
Jul 27, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
Is this an oversimplification? (treating a lens as a set of prisms)
.
Sure. It's a simplification. Three is less than infinity. Is it an oversimplification? Only if it is too simple to teach the desired...
Jul 27, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
B
Simple mass/scale puzzle
.
Yeah. I could not have gotten here without you. I should clarify: I didn't mean to suggest I succeeded where yall failed - I'm saying...
Jul 27, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
B
Simple mass/scale puzzle
.
Yes. This is the culmination. I would not have been able to get here without the explanations y'all have been providing. :smile: The...
Jul 27, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
B
Simple mass/scale puzzle
.
Yes. I am trying to intuit the diagram from a handyman's (layperson's) point of view. They don't know from Newtons; forces are hard to...
Jul 27, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
B
Simple mass/scale puzzle
.
I'm starting to understand how to intuit the 10kg reading in the scale without resorting to altering the scenario. We only need to look...
Jul 27, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
B
Simple mass/scale puzzle
.
That is an illuminating way of phrasing it... Even though it's been alluded to many times by many people in this thread, you've phrased...
Jul 27, 2025
DaveC426913
reacted to
A.T.'s post
in the thread
B
Simple mass/scale puzzle
with
Like
.
You talk about masses not forces. Thus you ignore the force that is always needed at the other side of the scale, even in the simple...
Jul 27, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
Wood/Glass/Metal
DIY lifting concrete blocks with a lever and a grabber
.
Yes. Yes. But it does need to work well enough to be labour-saving, not too fiddly to waste time or fall apart.
Jul 26, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
Wood/Glass/Metal
DIY lifting concrete blocks with a lever and a grabber
.
Great idea!
Jul 26, 2025
DaveC426913
reacted to
Lnewqban's post
in the thread
Wood/Glass/Metal
DIY lifting concrete blocks with a lever and a grabber
with
Love
.
Jul 26, 2025
DaveC426913
replied to the thread
Wood/Glass/Metal
DIY lifting concrete blocks with a lever and a grabber
.
Thanks I don't quite follow this last bit.
Jul 26, 2025
Forums
Back
Top