Recent content by David0983

Thats very true, maybe its just nice to think we could. Remember all great achievements in this world came from theories so maybe it will become a technology and we will be able to travel to distant galaxies without the time being changed around us when at C. Just a thought.

I get ya. But who said you can't use a frame, just because we hav'nt achieved light speed doesn't mean its impossible ;)

Also has it been taken into consideration (no doubt) about how SR and time slowing down (time dilation) in getting to a calculation on how much time changes with the speed of light to the destination (our position)? if so what is the calculation on how much time has slowed down in 10 light years...

...so why does there have to be an observer who is moving at c for the light to pass by? btw I am still new to this so there are some things i am still confused about ;) so don't take offence if any taken.

Ok i understand not being able to move an object at c but just because you can't observe it doesn't mean its not happening. But you do agree moving at c then another beam of light moving at c 1 second later, they would be both traveling at the speed of light but one beam of light behind at 1...

Oh ok, so why can't we use a frame moving at C?

I don't understand your responce because you stated if you were moving at the speed of light you would see a beam of light moving past you at the speed of light, how can you if you are already traveling at the speed of light? If what you are saying is an experiment conducted using light then...

I understand most of your views but i beg to differ in how old or young the light is when it gets here, if in fact due to relativity and light slowing down in time the actual light getting here can not be measured as its been affected by the changes in time too much to be calculated. To...

Ok if that theory is accurate how do you explain this: If one particle of light leaves its destination then another leaves 1 second after, the first beam of light will see the other beam of light traveling past it, if that is so then how do you explain this? the beam of light is already...

Further more, once the light has left the object the light is the same irrespective whether or not it is being slowed down through time. If that is true the actual object may not be, as stated above, as old as we think it is. So to get an actual accurate calculation we need to measure how...

If you could find out what energy is as a force, then i think you may find the answer to life itself. Perhaps.

Im quite new to studying so i maybe repeating a theory already presented: I don't understand how normal relativity (the theory's) can be accurate or i may add be completley wrong. If the light is slowed down in time as it travels through space then the light that is reaching us is'nt as...