Recent content by Dynamotime

Thanks for advise

is This example correct? I made it up Twin Z get close to a black hole to observe it (theoretically he is Not in orbit, Not moving but close in off to an black hole to be affect by the gravity of it, and the black is not moving in space or rotating) And Twin X stay behind on the mothership...

Thank you so much for info

If possible can someone tell me what is the formula of time dilation for an object Which theoretically is Not in orbit, Not moving but close in off to an black hole to be affect by the gravity of it. It will be greatly appreciated.

NASA did come up with % photons/neutrinos separated from the % of atoms; check image below the chart for the 380 000 years old universe…. Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe image http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/080998/index.html

I see what you are saying, my confusion was in your numbers, they are the % of whole Matter (atoms, ion, neutrinos, photons…) and my calculations do not include Matter with no mass aka photons and neutrinos (we can argue about neutrinos not having a mass (and why sometimes they have a very small...

If Marcus calculations are right, well maybe I have a problem with the Cosmology standard model and I am not the only one. http://www.scilogs.eu/en/blog/the-dark-matter-crisis/2010-09-19/the-standard-model-of-cosmology 75% (Dark matter + Atoms) it is the same percentage base on the Wilkinson...

Yes you are right I have a hypothesis, it is not a theory yet, to become a theory I need to verify my numbers and they need to be compatible with the Cosmology Standard Model, so far the only to come up with numbers is Marcus.

I have an explanation for it... I did misread his post, I thought he posted that a constant ratio existed between dark Matter and dark Energy. Did not made a lot sense to me…..That's what happens when you use copy and paste.. Yes I agree with you the ratio of dark matter and ordinary matter...

I am sure that we cannot see/observe all the "visible" matter in the universe but if the not seen "visible" matter is only 1% of the total of matter in the universe it doesn’t really “matter”.

1) If the ratio between dark matter and ordinary matter have remained constant for the last several billion years, it is a problem for my theory, in my model the % of dark energy has been growing faster than the % of dark matter. 2) I do not think dark energy is a recent thing, if it is; it...

Interesting 75% (Dark matter + Atoms) it is the same percentage base on the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe findings for a 380 000 years old universe. http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/media/080998/index.html If you are right for the first 6 billion years of the universe, the % stayed the same...

It is not overly speculative post; I just said my calculations (or theory) so far are verified by the findings of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Prob. And I have a mathematical model, I posted my findings base on my theory for the %s of the dark matter, atoms and “dark energy or/and...

I have a theory about what dark matter and dark energy is and so far my theory can explain the % of dark matter, atoms and dark energy for the present universe and the 380 000 old universe base on the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe findings http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/news/5yr_release.html...