FactChecker's latest activity
-
FactChecker reacted to sophiecentaur's post in the thread I Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves - real? with
Like.
You can't expect the sort of image resolution that you get with optical wavelengths. Optical telescopes can image lensing rings of the... -
FactChecker replied to the thread I Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves - real?.Since gravitational lensing is a result of the intermediate mass determining what the geodesic paths are (straight lines, shortest...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread I Find f(z) given f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x,y).is analytic. Don't leave that part out. It is critical. Two analytic functions that are equal on the real line must be identical. So...
-
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread I Find f(z) given f(x, y) = u(x, y) + iv(x,y) with Like.
These are analytic functions. That explains it.
-
Objects "experiencing gravity", whether in freefall or not, is not part of the theory of general relativity; it's a misunderstanding...
-
FactChecker reacted to Frabjous's post in the thread Engineering Find the distance given a function for v(t) with Like.
You ignored the 2 in the 2t term. You can get times from the velocity equation using the given velocities.
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Engineering Find the distance given a function for v(t).That's good so far. Your problem says that the speed goes from 7 to 99, but your equation for ##s## is in terms of time, ##t##. So what...
