Recent content by faiziqb12

thanks , maybe that could be considered as an compliment

well , this question may be a bit awkward , but will i read about helium dimer in high school , currently i am in 9th class .. well , i haven't even read the pauli exclusion principle yet that you mentioned so , is a graduate matter of study or high school ?

thanks for that .. well , exchanging even a single drop of knowledge , means you have changed the life of another person , and then admitting that is even a more beautiful deed , people like you are very rare . anyway , thanks !

sorry , i meant why specifically can't the phenomenon be explained without quantum electrodynamics or chromodynamics either..? well , i have understood the "i don't know" form you , so this reply is just a correction of what i said

why specifically can't the phenomenon be explained by quantum electrodynamics..? and could you also give the links where i could find about , how to explain this phenomenon by quantum electrons or rather please explain yourself

thanks for the answer my question is somewhat resolved .. it looks like velocity of the moving object is is its ability to break the atomic force and reach nearer the atom , so if we have such a large velocity of the moving object that it can coincide with the nucleus and still have some...

basically , it appears like when a moving atom reaches another stationary atom they must both move together because the molecular force between them will join them together . So , if my reasoning is right an atom will never rebound back or give its velocity to the stationary atom , but rather...

i am sorry but i didnt get you

thats fine but the distance itself depends on the velocity . doesnt it ?

could you please elaborate the process

let's look at force at the atomic level to understand the Newtons third law of motion. I'll use Helium atoms as an example. Now imagine we start with one atom HE2 stationary, and throw another atom HE1 at it.It is the velocity of HE1 that affects the motion of HE2 , because the system of these...

so , how might one do simultaneouslty in pure and applied , or change between pure and applied. is that possible? also can one choose to do bachelors degree in pure maths and then a postgraduate degree in applied maths ?

thats what the thing comes in , i don't really care about applications of pure maths and i solely love maths without being concerned about its applications

most probably your professor is a applied maths professor.but i think pure is better than applied , even if it doesn't sound like having a value nowadays

SO , basically research means just investigating mathametics , and does not necesserily require a person to do some new discovery . right , sir ? and what do you need to do to get a promising research position anywhere , (not asking about being a professor)? and does pure mathametics give you...