gentzen's latest activity
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.The directed conditional probabilities by themselves don't yet specify (or commit to) a dynamics for the classical configuration between...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.But here, ##t_0## is a division event. Together with your "I read this to mean" below, you get some sort of connection around division...
-
gentzen reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Like.
It's a term I'm borrowing from Barandes himself. For Bohmian mechanics it is the hypothesis that the configuration of a systems evolves... -
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.That is a connection to the time parameter, but not a connection to its continuity. Without a connection to the continuity of time, it...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Because the connection to the continuity of the time parameter is missing, it currently fails to describe an evolution. The easiest and...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.The unistochastic transition matrix evolves continuously. Nothing is said about how the state evolves between division events, and...
-
gentzen reacted to iste's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with Like.
Only if they don't tell you whats going on between measurements. Something like Bohmian mechanics tells you. Maybe empirically it would...
-
gentzen reacted to A.T.'s post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with
Haha.
Just in some branches. -
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Did he succeed to convince Sean Carroll? Did he even try? In the comments below the transcript, I found a pingpack to the following...
-
gentzen reacted to lodbrok's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with Like.
On the contrary, I think Barandes adds very important things that relate to ontology even without explicitly providing an intuition...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Nice contribution. I agree with two of your points: I would have liked him to do more work on that „quantum reconstruction“ side...
-
gentzen reacted to Fra's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
I agree there is always something one can call intuition, just like in an inference system there are "implicit prior information" that...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….I guess this is mostly a mathematical artifact in this situation, caused by a continuum modeling in time, combined with a...
-
gentzen reacted to bhobba's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
It is simply that we know standard QM is wrong, eg it predicts the hydrogen states are stationary, so can't jump between them. Yet they...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….So your guess is that there is no interpretation of non-relativistic QM that is comparable to Einstein's solution of the riddles of...
