gentzen's latest activity
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….Maybe the trick to understand Bohr would be to focus on his discussions with other physicists and scientists, instead of trying to make...
-
gentzen reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with
Like.
I think that's a fair assumption. Bohr was famous for coraling new physicists at his institute into joining him in his office to help... -
gentzen replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….Sorry, I don't even see the names Bohr or Heisenberg on that slide. Also, the question is not so much the difference of philosophy...
-
gentzen reacted to Fra's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
I wonder, are we "using Bohr" to strenghten our own new ideas/interpretations... OR Are we honouring Bohr as one of the founders, by...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Commutator of x and p in quantum mechanics.Momentum is the Noether current associated with translation invariance. The momentum operator is the generator of translations. This is...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….If I were you, I would not even try connect my own ideas to what Bohr might have ment by his obscure words: I have no idea what Bohr...
-
gentzen reacted to Lord Jestocost's post in the thread I Modern View of Quantum Phenomena with Like.
One reads from the “THE MATHEMATICAL PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY” by Sir Isaac Newton (translated into English by Andrew Motte)...
-
gentzen reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread A Challenge to Bohmian mechanics by Sharoglazova et al, Nature, 2025 with Like.
https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/26230/
-
This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.For me, checking your texts for omitted words and unnecessary typos before posting would be enough.
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Fra‘s frequent typos, word omissions, and grammar mistakes contribute a lot to making his posts hard to decipher: Fra may believe...
-
gentzen reacted to iste's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with Like.
Yes, in https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.10778 he seems to acknowledge that there is no meaning to trajectories without constructing...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.I just thought that the two distributions nicely illustrate that without further clarification, it remains ambiguous whether there is an...
-
gentzen reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with Like.
The two distributions are answers to different questions: One distribution answers what the configuration is likely to be, given an...
-
gentzen reacted to Fra's post in the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM with Like.
Good question, and I think this ia very often true! Taking the empirical content - in context - serious is what lead me to the...
