Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
gentzen's latest activity
gentzen
reacted to
A. Neumaier's post
in the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
with
Like
.
Yes. The evolution of the radiated system in a homogeneous medium is generally assumed to be unitary, with an effective dynamics...
Sep 17, 2025
gentzen
reacted to
pines-demon's post
in the thread
I
Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?
with
Like
.
Here is a usual scheme for entanglement There are two entangled particles. Alice receives one of the particles, Bob receives the other...
Sep 14, 2025
gentzen
reacted to
PeterDonis's post
in the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
with
Informative
.
You can--by creating an environment where the quantum states of the decay products are already occupied, or partially occupied. (And for...
Sep 14, 2025
gentzen
reacted to
Demystifier's post
in the thread
I
Question about discussions around quantum interpretations
with
Like
.
If you agree that isolated atom evolves deterministically, then non-determinism must be associated with interaction with the...
Sep 13, 2025
gentzen
reacted to
RUTA's post
in the thread
I
Modern View of Quantum Phenomena
with
Like
.
I’m in the hospital. Had appendectomy last night. Can’t respond properly now. Update: I'm home now and I see the post does not require...
Sep 12, 2025
gentzen
reacted to
Morbert's post
in the thread
I
Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons
with
Like
.
As an aside: When we write Bell states like $$\ket{\psi} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\ket{\uparrow}_1\ket{\downarrow}_2 +...
Sep 8, 2025
gentzen
reacted to
pines-demon's post
in the thread
I
Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons
with
Like
.
I thought that was clear, I did not wait until you found out, more like I was discussing without knowing that you got something off (I...
Sep 8, 2025
gentzen
replied to the thread
I
Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons
.
I had misinterpreted what you wanted to do with your ##S_x## and ##S_p##: Your intention was to use them like the spin measurement...
Sep 8, 2025
gentzen
replied to the thread
I
Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons
.
This again tell me more about your image from me, than about where I might have misinterpreted you, where I might have lost you, or...
Sep 8, 2025
gentzen
replied to the thread
I
Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?
.
It depends on how you interpret it in detail. If you have one qubit per photon, like the polarization, then it is certainly true. If you...
Sep 8, 2025
gentzen
replied to the thread
I
Modern View of Quantum Phenomena
.
I guess I found it, but I didn't write anything about how to get from one parameter to two, or that I am still confused about where I...
Sep 8, 2025
gentzen
replied to the thread
I
Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons
.
Maybe you should also start to react with "of course" from time to time, otherwise I have little idea where I lost you, or where we...
Sep 8, 2025
gentzen
replied to the thread
I
Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons
.
You are missing Your sign measurement operators ##S_x## and ##S_p## are no longer representable by a single state, hence you have to...
Sep 4, 2025
gentzen
replied to the thread
I
Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons
.
Yes, of course. I guess what you didn't understand is that your ##|\alpha|^2S_x+|\beta|^2S_p## is missing those interference terms...
Sep 4, 2025
gentzen
replied to the thread
I
Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons
.
This is an observable. Your ##S_x## and ##S_p## were observables too. Maybe to clarify, we have ##\alpha=\cos(\theta)## and...
Sep 4, 2025
Forums
Back
Top