Recent content by Instine

Wow, great. Thanks. Just the sort of thing I'm after. Will read and get back.

proposal: Gravity is an effect of uncertainty gradients. Probability density currents are recognised phenomina in quantum mechanics/dynamics. A wave-particle's uncertainty is acknowledged as a fundamental property, oscillating through space and time. The classic experimental...

"since they must remain independent as implied by so well adopted dualism." I don't see the need to seporate observer and observed. Mass is event, light observation, time and space dimension, Probability, I would argue also dimension. The brain has no part to play in the 'the laws'. You can't...

Nice post sneez. I'll ponder...

"I think that most would agree that the fundamental laws of physics--past, present and future--do not depend on logic" I for one disagree. Everything, by definition, must be founded on logic. "so we can delete Hume from the discussion." Actually I started it to discuss him, so I'd...

Not sure I get your point? Evidence itself is in question here. There should be reason for evidence to 'matter'. If you are to base all reason on evidence. Which is the problem with falsificationism. You're not offering any. That I can see. I'm suggesting simultaneity is evidence for...

His point was that "empirical evidence" is not evidence enough if we are to base everything else (including our belief in empirical evidence) on it. Its this circular argument that Hume had a distaste for. Just as those who say that the bible is right because it says so are often brought to...

Bingo. Nicely put.

Its precise not 'reasonable', i.e. you can't reason it. There is no reason, as far as I'm aware, which is why I'm putting forward this theory, that relativistic simultineity affords us fractal reality. Saying the future will statistically resemble the present, presurposes that it will exist at...

Spontaniously loosing a dimension. Reality ceasing to exist at all. All masses doubling for no apparent reason... You get the idea. The Laws of physics are broken. Hume speaks of Futures not 'resembling' pasts. This is what has generally been understood by this. Exactly, Hume is talking...

Hi Sorry, you seem to have missed my point entirely. Its not the relativistic effect that I believe would make an "incongruous reality", quite the opisite. I'm suggesting that the simultineity issues raised by relativity mean that an "incongruous reality" can't happen, else unobservable...

This came to me in the middle of the night. Literally. I got up and wrote it down at 4:09am. Having lain awake in bed pondering it for at-least an hour. I clearly need to get out more. Scientific belief is a funny thing... Inductivism hasn't had it easy in the last century or two. While...

Lol sorry. Thats an annoying habit of mine. I just made a quick post, and then spent half an hour editing it. Sorry. Thank you SelfAjoint. If you break a hologram, the peices contain the entire image. Is this relevant? You given me some good stuff to get reading about. As I said...

No, but yes this does sound interesting. Cheers for this pointer. I've not touched physics in 9 years, and had never heard of Padmanabhan. (shame on me) My own world theory is probably influencing this stance on 'what is a universe'. I believe that we may describe the universe in 6...

Right - I've set up a https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=124970". Not had/got time to give much of an answer yet, but more will come.