Recent content by IooqXpooI

  1. I

    Solving a Random Equation: a=dt_o/t^3sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

    Ok, after trying to prove them, I have found that all but one are wrong...:( It seems that I accidentally concluded that \frac{1}{2} mv^2=E...
  2. I

    Solving a Random Equation: a=dt_o/t^3sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

    Sorry about that...You were correct. I edited them in. Thanks!
  3. I

    Solving a Random Equation: a=dt_o/t^3sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

    A random equation... a=\frac{dt_{o}}{t^3\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}} Where: a is acceleration, d is distance traveled, t is the time of the observer(stationary), t_o is the time of the moving observer, and c is the constant of light(the speed of light). Just to see how this fares with you guys.
  4. I

    Equations: E=\frac{1}{2}W & a=\frac{dt}{t_o \sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

    E=\frac{1}{2}W ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Note really sure about that one... a=\frac{dt}{t_o \sqrt{1- \frac{v^2}{c^2}} v=\sqrt{da} Just to see how these fare with you guys(#2 is a play on the relativity equation), and how I'm doing with the 'tex' code.
  5. I

    Pythagorean Theorem: Simplifying with Ab/Ab + Bc/Bc = Ac/Ac

    Are you stating that c in a^2 + b^2= c ^2 is light speed?
  6. I

    Does Spinning on a Top Cause Acceleration?

    I am sorry, I'm not very good with words...I couldn't find the right word...I'll edit it now. Thanks!
  7. I

    Does Spinning on a Top Cause Acceleration?

    Imagine you are spinning on a top. You naturally go to the edge, correct? Well, I have heard that you do not experience acceleration, but I would think otherwise. Though you are moving relative to the object, and the Force that it applies to you should get anything with a mass of one to...
  8. I

    An attempt to unify EM and Grav., just to see if my ideas are in order.

    I would like to relate EM and Gravitation by trying to use energy and Quantum theory etc. Since I know nothing of Quantum Theory, you might think me a fool. To relate them, I will state one thing: Energy has direction. Now, I have seen a(and only one) Feynman diagram, and I probably...
  9. I

    Zero Point: Solving for it and what it is.

    OK. I am assuming that holistic is wholistic...whatever. I understand that, though I cannot get that from the original statement.
  10. I

    Zero Point: Solving for it and what it is.

    I don't know...Just an example-:)
  11. I

    Zero Point: Solving for it and what it is.

    Please, explain it to we who do not have enough knowledge to find your words explaining of your point!
  12. I

    Zero Point: Solving for it and what it is.

    C'mon! Someone criticize this or tell me why you can't!
  13. I

    What are the forces applying to antimatter?

    Yes yes, I know this, but I wasn't sure about the forces applying to them...Well, now that it has been confirmed, you may ignore this theory...;)
  14. I

    Zero Point: Solving for it and what it is.

    C'mon...someone?
  15. I

    What are the forces applying to antimatter?

    I don't know if this is true or not, and I have a feeling that it has already been proven otherwise, but I think that the forces applying to antimatter are flipped. For instance, a positron and an electron would repel, and a positron and a proton would attract(don't mind the inserting of the...
Back
Top