Recent content by Isaac Hart

Apon doing research, I think I meant to say a W state entanglement. In this type of entanglement, complete loss of entanglement can be achieved by actions at A, which could be observable at points B and C. I would very much like to know, as I said, what methods you could use to determine quantum...

Okay so I would like to know if and how it would be possible to determine whether B and C are entangled or unentangled without talking to particle A. Thank you very much for offering to help, I am below highschool level so am not sure about the maths involved.

Please can someone just tell me what methods you can use to measure or detect the integrity of entanglement between 2 out of 3 entangled particles?

There must be some mechanism you can use to determine whether two particles are entangled or not—thats like the fundamentals of quantum mechanics. For instance, if one particle had a spin state of up and the other down, you would know they are entangled. And if you had two particles both up you...

Say you had 3 particles all of which were entangled in the GHZ format. What methods could you use to measure the entanglement between two of the particles? Say particle A was far away and particles B and C were close together. If you used magnetic fields at point A to break the entanglement...

This is what the internet is telling me: Source 1 What is the Equivalence Principle? In the theory of general relativity, the equivalence principle is the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass, and Albert Einstein’s observation that the gravitational “force” is experienced locally...

That's interesting, I will have to find out what a worldline is. Alternative point: Due to the 'equivalence principle' which is that to accelerating observers it appears as if spacetime is bent. Does that mean that if a particle was accelerated at such a high rate would experience the event...

Please provide more detail, I am talking about acceleration not constant speed. Acceleration bends space-time speed does not. You don't need a particle/object to move really fast - all you need is it to accelerate. Thanks for the feedback though.

Here is my question Imagine if you had an object, this object is then accelerated. The process of acceleration bends space-time. For a black hole to form there must be extreme curvature of spacetime. Therefore, accelerating an object at such a high rate could create a black hole. I am not...

Oh, my bad. Again thank you very much for clearing that point. Although you said that this is not a good way to learn, I have learnt a great deal, I won't post anything for a weak and when I do it will be less nonsense than I have posted here.

Bell's theorem, proposed by physicist John S. Bell in 1964, states that no physical theory of local hidden variables can reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics. This theorem leads to Bell's inequalities, which are mathematical inequalities that must be satisfied by any local...

Why certainly, everything is chaotic in a way. Painting a house with paintballs would certainly be an interesting way of going about it. It people that take the most interesting routes who find success in their fields of work, I hope to be one of them. Have a nice day, Vanadium 50. =)

Thank you DrChinese, that has put an end to my little train of thought. I greatly appreciate the clarification on This thread. I hope to see the day that someone knocks down that pesty no-signalling theorem. =)

Could someone please clarify a question that I had? Is it true that 3 or more electrons/particles can be described under one wavefunction, making them entangled? If so, could you use Bell's principles of the comparison of their states like their spin, polarization or position to see if two out...

I am only trying to argue my point of view, I would like you to explain how it is a classical description and not a quantum description. I have been told why my ideas are wrong, however I would like to know why they are wrong. I am a 15 year old who is interested in quantum mechanics, I have no...