Recent content by jerusalem

Mr. ibrahim we agreed to ask a Science Advisor and stop arguing I am afraid that Mr.ibrahim won't get that answer. I never said that, it doesn't matter what you are when you said: "energy can be borrow from NOTHING" that called misconception the space is not "NOTHING" the vacuum energy...

my friend it not my problem if you can not understand the same answer again and again. yes there is no experiment that can give such accuracy. but the statement in the lower left panel is not supposed to represent any experiment ! forget about Mr-halifax12 if you are "over the paranoid-thing...

this is my problem with my friend Ibrahim, I write south he understand north. he is trying to impose what the figure never meant. he claimed for both figures that Ω = 1.00000000 statement is misleading. I will repeat the answer of cepheid "My answer would be no, and I wonder why you think it...

I already invited you my friend before two days to talk about the Parsimony in our forum.

my friend Ibrahim I don't know what surname are you talking about! I don't have time for that! I will go straight to to the key point:: your understanding of locality doesn't change your judgement about the entire universe. when you confirm that (we can be sure that the entire universe is...

my friend Ibrahim64 By denying here what you wrote in our debate .. you just proved my point. thank you.

Thank you guys for your replies

is there a degree of precision, if reached, we can say for sure that we are living in an infinite euclidean space? well my interlocutor refused this possibility and claimed that (boomerang and wmap..) measure the shape of the ENTIRE universe because the photon we detect started its journey...

we were arguing about what Dr.Michio Kaku said here: Dr. Tom Murphy : ie: we should not rule out the possibility of a closed universe in a larger scale. since we only mesure the observable universe:

thank you cepheid, quote: "I wonder why you think it might be" I had an argument with some one who claimed that Ω = 1.000000.. gives a false impression about the precision of the instruments. I need to convince him that the statement in the lower left panel has nothing to do with the...

hi, is it misleading to write omega = 1.0000... for the ideally flat space?