Recent content by jf117

  1. jf117

    Graduate John Bell 1964 toy model for spin

    Thank you for your comment, @.Scott. It says a' depends on a and p in a way to be specified. Fine, as it is to be specified, I can live with that until a' is used. But then <σ⋅a> is calculated and the result depends on θ', which is the angle between a' and p. Perhaps knowing how that result...
  2. jf117

    Graduate John Bell 1964 toy model for spin

    I have never been able to fully grasp John Bell toy model for spin in his 1964 article. He starts with a particle with pure spin state p. There exists a hidden variable called λ with a probability distribution given by a uniform distribution over the hemisphere λ⋅p > 0. I guess this uniform...
  3. jf117

    Spintronic Job Opportunities: Find Your Dream Career in Spintronics!

    Perhaps I could join in the request by re-defining it: could somebody give names and/or places actively researching spintronics? J
  4. jf117

    Graduate What if Planck's Constant was 6.63x10^30?

    What is this "Merriam's relational view"? :confused: J
  5. jf117

    Graduate What if Planck's Constant was 6.63x10^30?

    I agree. :approve: J
  6. jf117

    Graduate What if Planck's Constant was 6.63x10^30?

    I'm not the same guy that "Perturbation" refers to. By the way, I perfectly understand your point, and I basically agree with you. But I think the spirit of the proposed topic was something like: "If, at the moment in history when it was introduced, we had discovered that Planck's constant...
  7. jf117

    Calculating Angular Acceleration of a Shaft

    In fact, any time an RPM is given it is meant that the rotatory motion is uniform, i.e. the angular velocity is a constant and , therefore, the angular acceleration is zero. Perhaps the problem meant to ask the centripetal acceleration? J
  8. jf117

    Graduate What if Planck's Constant was 6.63x10^30?

    Actually, making \hbar that big would mean making the rest of the world (us) very small, not big. I agree with you that these are tricky arguments, but then the whole topic's theme is quite tricky. J
  9. jf117

    Undergrad Differential Equations: I hate them.

    Could I have the exact reference for this "arno'ld's book", please? J
  10. jf117

    The Sense of Life: Is It Necessary?

    Well, it depends on what is meant by "sensing the outside world". Even a single cell continuously exchanges stuff with the external world, be it big macromolecules or small molecules. And a whole series of internal or external mechanisms arise due to this exchange. Isn't this kind of sensing...
  11. jf117

    Graduate What if Planck's Constant was 6.63x10^30?

    An easy way of thinking to it is the exact opposite to the arguments used to prove that our world would be exclusively governed by classical laws if \hbar\rightarrow 0 . When Planck's constant becomes very big, then all physical laws will tend to become quantum laws. In such a case we would...
  12. jf117

    A QM problem on finding eigenvalues

    Do you mean: \sum_{v} |v\rangle\langle v| = 1? Or just | v \rangle \langle v|=1?
  13. jf117

    Graduate Energy conservation in two-slit experiment

    I don't understand what is wrong in assuming an ideal plate with no thickness along the z direction. We are using it to prepare the state for our particle. Thanks to this plate/slit system, which acts as a filter, we have, for all times immediately after t=0, partial localization for the y...
  14. jf117

    Graduate Energy conservation in two-slit experiment

    When we use the plate/slit for the system preparation we are in fact reducing the particle's state to certain, definite values. In our specific case, slit with a width along y, the initial position ket will be |x,y0,z+>, where x means anywhere along x, y0 means a single, specific value on y, and...
  15. jf117

    Graduate Energy conservation in two-slit experiment

    Sorry, I just got the sense of your reply now! What you are saying is that no measurement at all is made on the z (or x) component, because the slit width is only along y. We could therefore shift backward and forward the plate along z, or shift upward or downward the slit along x, and nothing...