Recent content by Johan0001

Thanks guys , a lot of food for thought , fascinating stuff. Need to think about this a lot more and get some good references to study. I usually watch talks given by Penrose, Susskind, Brian Greene, Carrol to keep me on track. The math is my problem though. Regards

thank you guys for your comments Johan0001 said: This would imply that space inside the event horizon stretches toward this singularity No, it doesn't. Nor is this true. Peterdonis can you elaborate on this , my analogy of space time curvature close to the black hole was a stretch like...

Hi All I'm sure this question has been covered previously , but when searching I do not find a definitive answers. I recently watch some talks given by Kip Thorne that had me thinking about black holes and their densities. So my deduction is as follows . Using General relativity, and...

Why are ALL underlying HIDDEN variables/interactions excluded from a possible explanation, with the Bell paper. This was my first assumption, of the three , I put forward, in my original post, I was posing the question as to why entanglement (spooky action) was chosen over a...

Agreed , but the point I was trying to make previously is that the 2 "Quantum objects" which could be photons/electrons , may have slight differences in their known properties. So when they interact with their "detectors" they do not produce the same expected classical values but have...

Yes agreed again , QM probabilities predict a stronger Correlation. Which we cannot deny. But in my view ALL probabilities (Classical or QM) have at their root Realism/ hard coded variables , by which they are approximated over repetition , and deduced. To explain the violation is i...

Yes I follow your reasoning above. And you are correct if you can't measure the difference you can assume it being hidden. In my analogy above , if I start to record differences, (in the expected Dice probabilities) I would tend to go for my first conclusion , that the Dice are not...

Hi DrClaude What was trying to compare with this analogy , is that the density of the two die is not uniform. The density variable is not hidden , but they may be different in the individual die. Similairly the energy of each pair of photons , not being a hidden variable, but slightly...

Thank you guys ,lot of information above to ponder on. Will do some homework ..and revert back.

But perhaps their total energy/frequency of photon are slightly different. Photons as smeared out in free space not point particles, is this correct? I know I'm going off topic , but if we adopt string theory for example , are we saying that entangled photons have exactly the same...

I have been thinking about the Violation of bell inequalities , trying to justify how non locality can be determined from violation of bell tests. I have been through Dr. Chinese page which has partially convinced me that there can be no hidden variables , but I need to understand what...

The sandpipers Thanks guys .

Apologies , i thought that Neutrinos were massless. So in essence are you saying there is no "box" that can be defined with massless particles ( or any other for that matter) other than photons. That could travel at c with the two enclosed photons?

Thanks Peter I understand the point you make. One more question Theoretically speaking, my thought experiment. If we enclosed my two photons in a large empty vacuum cube with neutrinos at each Corner , all traveling in the same direction. Why can we not define this as an Inertial...

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/rest-frame-of-a-photon.511170/ I read in the above link and some of its references , that a photon cannot have a rest frame with v = 0, since it travels at c in all universal frames of reference. If for example 2 photons leave the sun and travel towards...