Recent content by johnnyICON
-
J
Undergrad A simple permutation question or not so simple
awesome man, this is exactly how my prof wanted us to do it. thanks- johnnyICON
- Post #9
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Undergrad A simple permutation question or not so simple
here is a solution that I found, but uses a round table instead of a row. How many ways can 5 man and 7 women be seated at a round table with no 2 men next to each other? Solution. First place the women in 6!. Now there are 7C5 ways to pick 5 spots for the men so that they are not...- johnnyICON
- Post #7
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Undergrad A simple permutation question or not so simple
What I got was, mWmWmWmWW WmWmWmWmW WWmWmWmWm mWWmWmWmW WmWWmWmWm mWmWWmWmW WmWmWWmWm mWmWmWWmW WmWmWmWWm There are 9 in total. Each arrangement is 5!4!. Therefore 5!*4!*9 is the number of ways this can be done. Is this coorect?- johnnyICON
- Post #6
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Undergrad A simple permutation question or not so simple
I should of mentioed that each person is distinguishable from another. There are no two that are a like.- johnnyICON
- Post #5
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Undergrad A simple permutation question or not so simple
What if I were to up the ante of men and women to 4 and 5, respectively. During an exam, I shouldn't be writing all the possible permutations for the problem. I would get 4!5! for each arrangement, but how do I know how many arrangements there is going to be?- johnnyICON
- Post #3
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Undergrad A simple permutation question or not so simple
How many ways can 2 men and 3 women be seated in a row such that no 2 men are sitting beside each other? Now I have always had a problem with overthinking these kinds of questions. I'll usually write something down but then doubt myself. What I did was simply did 2! * 3!. 3 * 2 * 2 * 1 *...- johnnyICON
- Thread
- Permutation
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Graduate Proving the Convergence of a Sequence Defined by Induction
I'm still fixated on this. :biggrin: Maybe if I make the Cs Zs instead?- johnnyICON
- Post #9
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Graduate Proving the Convergence of a Sequence Defined by Induction
"A sequence z0,z1,z2,... is defined by letting z0=3, and zk=(zk-1)2 for all integers k greater than equal to 1. Show that Ci=32i for i greater than or equal to 0." I e-mailed my professor, he said it is supposed to be Zi, not C... I don't know if that helps...- johnnyICON
- Post #7
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Graduate Proving the Convergence of a Sequence Defined by Induction
The very first sentence is straight from my textbook. I'm guessing Ci is just another way of representing Zk.- johnnyICON
- Post #5
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Graduate Proving the Convergence of a Sequence Defined by Induction
Here's how far I've gotten now, I'm trying to show that Ck+1=32k+1. By definition, Ck+1 = (Ck)2 = (32k)2 By the Induction Hypothesis = (32k(2)) = (32k+1) Is that correct?- johnnyICON
- Post #4
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Graduate Proving the Convergence of a Sequence Defined by Induction
Is this to be done using "Strong Induction" I was using basic mathematical induction.- johnnyICON
- Post #2
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Graduate Proving the Convergence of a Sequence Defined by Induction
A sequence z0,z1,z2,... is defined by letting z0=3, and zk=(zk-1)2 for all integers k greater than equal to 1. Show that Ci=32i for i greater than or equal to 0. I wasn't to clear on what it meant by this, so what I have is that I am trying to show that Zk = Ci. Is that correct? From...- johnnyICON
- Thread
- Induction
- Replies: 8
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Undergrad New to induction, stuck on a proof and i need some help
Whoops, ignore my previous post. :D- johnnyICON
- Post #7
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Undergrad New to induction, stuck on a proof and i need some help
Isn't it though? By the induction hypothesis I am assuming that P(n) is true, that is 3 divides n3-7k+3 where n is just k+1.- johnnyICON
- Post #6
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
J
Undergrad New to induction, stuck on a proof and i need some help
Ahhh, I didn't notice that when I was expanding out. The k's threw me off :( Question: You expanded -7(k+1). Where is the -7? [(k+1)^3-7k+3]-7 The equation within the brackets is divisible by 3, but -7 is not. I really like this approach because this is more of how I would try to solve the...- johnnyICON
- Post #4
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra