Recent content by josecuervo

  1. J

    Solving for sp Hybrid Orbital: \Psi_{sp1}

    If anyone could help, I would greatly appreciate it.
  2. J

    Solving for sp Hybrid Orbital: \Psi_{sp1}

    Homework Statement Find the other sp hybrid orbital given \Psi_{sp1} = 3\Psi_{2s} + 4\Psi_{2pz} using the orthonormal relationships. I do not know how to start the problem. if someone could help get me pointed in the right direction or help me through it I would greatly appreciate it : )
  3. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    how did you get that? it was given in the problem that the true initial value is 0.125h^{2}/m_{e}a^{2} or .0199h^{2}/m_{e}a^{2} did you plug the k value into E_{min}=(h^{2}/m_{e}a^{2})(4k^{2}+k)/(2k-1)
  4. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    is there anyway you could work through the problem and double check my work? I've worked through it twice now and still haven't gotten an answer that looks right
  5. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    and I tried the negative number and it's even worse. Did I do something wrong?
  6. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    ok. sorry, dumb moment. so I solved for k=-.11237 and k=1.11237. then I plugged the positive k value into E and got 3.133(h^{2}/m_{e}a^{2}) or 19.68(h^{2}/m_{e}a^{2}) which isn't even in the ballpark of the true value.
  7. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    Okay, but if the value of k is 0, then that doesn't go with the problem. In the problem it states that there will be a positive and negative value for the parameter and it asks why the positive number is better. And if k is 0 then the approximation won't work when you plug back into E_{min}
  8. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    the derivative doesn't seem to be solveable because there's no way to move anything over to the other side. and I know that I'll get multiple values of k when I solve.
  9. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    I'm having problems deriving and solving for k. When I take the derivative, I get dE/dk=(h/(m_{e}a^{2})(8k^{2}-8k-1)/(1-2k)^{2}=0 and I'm having problems solving for it. am I doing something wrong?
  10. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    would I take the derivative dE/dk and then solve for k?
  11. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    Could I assume that the integral on bottom is already normalized? what could I do then? could I just solve for k values?
  12. J

    Variational method particle in box approx.

    Homework Statement use the variational method to approximate the ground state energy of the particle in a one-dimentional box using the normalized trial wavefunction ∅(x)=Nx^{k}(a-x)^{k} where k is the parameter. Demonstrate why we choose the positive number rather than the negative...
  13. J

    Question about normalization of wavefunction

    Ok I've set up the integral like this:\ointsin^{3}\theta*dv with the bounds being 0 to 2pi for phi, and 0 to pi for theta. I left out r because it will make the integral go to infinity, but I'm still getting a pi in the answer. when I left out the phi part of the integral I got 4/3. what am I...
  14. J

    Question about normalization of wavefunction

    I know it needs to be switched to polar coordinates and your equation you posted is correct. I know that it is normalizable (1=int(psi^2dv) over all space, i just need a confirmation of the correct set up of the integral and the bounds. I've tried it several different ways with different bounds...
Back
Top